F1 »

RRA 'at crossroads', admits Brawn

Ross Brawn believes that F1's cost-cutting controls are at 'a crossroads' amid rumour and speculation over flaws in the system.
Mercedes GP boss Ross Brawn has suggested that the means of controlling spending in F1 needs to be more tightly policed, if only to prevent rumours that the agreement is being abused.

Speaking ahead of the Korean Grand Prix, Brawn admitted that the biggest teams in the sport, and therefore those with the most spending power, are beginning to feel the effects of the Resource Restriction Agreement, where the eight smallest teams have always had to operate below the ceiling imposed. With such a gap between the 'haves' and 'have-nots', however, Brawn acknowledges that there will always been suspicions that the rules are being flouted.

"I think it's at a crossroads because it's now starting to bite those three or four teams who have to control their resource to comply," the former eponymous team principal explained, "I think there's seven or eight teams for whom the RRA means nothing because they're always going to be below the limit, [but] now we're at a stage where the targets that were set are starting to bite into the three or four [big teams] and this is where it starts to get contentious.

Both Brawn's Mercedes team and reigning double champion Red Bull have been accused of attempting to find ways around the RRA, but the Briton insists that transparency can only be achieved of the Agreement is policed more firmly.

"We're total supporters of the idea of RRA but, for us, it has to be much more robust in how it's controlled, how it's monitored, how it's policed, because it's a performance differentiator," Brawn continued, "You can't deny that a team spending five million more each year will have an advantage over a team that doesn't do that. [That] leads to the innuendo and accusations that get thrown around.

"It has to be very well controlled, very strongly audited and it has to be done by a reference which is the same for all teams, otherwise we have no guarantee of parity, and I think for us, RRA is at a crossroads. We support it totally, but the teams have to come together to find a solution to make sure that we're all comfortable with the way we go, forward or else we will have a continuation of the problems that we're having at the moment, all the comments, the rumour, the innuendo, the distrust that we have.

"We're working on an agreement that we thought we already had, which doesn't end for several years, and that's the problem that we have at the moment. We don't have complete unity on RRA and we have to have it, because Mercedes are total supporters of the concept of RRA, but it has to be a fair and proper, correctly policed, correctly monitored, correctly audited system which is the same for everybody."

Despite Brawn's comments regarding a longer-term solution, the current RRA is due to expire next season, but has proven to be a solid means of keeping the smaller, and newer, teams alive in the sport, as Marussia Virgin's John Booth acknowledges.

"The RRA is very, very important to us," the former F3 team owner admitted, "Remember, we gave up a lot, together with the other new teams, we gave up a lot in the entry to the sport. We gave up the option B and we gave up the price cap and bought into the RRA wholeheartedly and it's very, very important to us that it continues and we work towards the agreement. I think a spending formula where three or maybe four teams could thrive is not what people want and we must work very hard to avoid that.

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Adrian Quaife-Hobbs and Virgin Racing team principal John Booth
24.09.2011- Martin Whitmarsh (GBR), Chief Executive Officer Mclaren
07.10.2011- Friday Practice 1, Ross Brawn (GBR), Team Principal, Mercedes GP
22.05.2011- Race, start
25.06.2017 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, The race stopped, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32 and the Safety car
25.06.2017 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, The Safety car and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, Carlos Sainz Jr (ESP) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR12 and Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32
25.06.2017 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 and the Safety car
25.06.2017 - Race, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32 and Marcus Ericsson (SUE) Sauber C36
25.06.2017 - Race, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32 and 3rd place Lance Stroll (CDN) Williams FW40
25.06.2017 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, 1st place Daniel Ricciardo (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB13, 2nd place Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 and 3rd place Lance Stroll (CDN) Williams FW40
25.06.2017 - Race, Stoffel Vandoorne (BEL) McLaren MCL32

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

Caroline - Unregistered

October 15, 2011 3:20 PM

All the top 4 teams break the RRA, Ferrari for example claim nearly 100 engineers actually work on their historic F1 cars ... Sure. Mercedes don't count the people that work on the engines, and all the top teams use 'bogus' external companies to do work, because the RRA allows for more money to be spent on external services rather than internal ones. And FOTA have diluted the RRA anyway ... The external services cap was set at Euro 20 million, but FOTA increased it to Euro 30 million, staff numbers were capped at 280, but FOTA increased this to 315, but all these caps are still broken by the top 4 teams. FOTA should have excepted the Cost Cap idea (which under the name Budget Cap, was first proposed by Ross Brawn himself, and then taken up by Max Mosley) and that excluded the pay to drivers and a top designer, and gave more design and engineering freedoms, but FOTA in their amazing wisdom rejected it, and went for an unaccountable mishmash of regulations that none of the top 4 teams

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.