18 October 2011
Champions say racing needs to remain vigilant
Dan Wheldon's fatal accident has awakened opinions on safety in all forms of motorsport.
Two British motorsport greats have come out with opposing views on the state of safety provisions in the wake of Dan Wheldon's tragic accident in Las Vegas on Sunday, as the IndyCar Series continues to face criticism for several elements of the fateful season finale.
While sections of the press who would scarcely have given the event a moment's thought prior to the 15-car pile-up which claimed the life of the 33-year old Briton launch into full-on witch-hunts, Nigel Mansell and Sir Jackie Stewart have offered more measured opinions, although both believe that unnecessary risks may have been taken by race organisers at the weekend.
Mansell, who moved to the US-based Champ Car series after winning the F1 world championship in 1992, praised the current level of safety in grand prix racing, and suggested that the Americans could take tips from the top flight. Stewart, who raced in the Indianapolis 500 early in his career, was less enthusiastic about the level of safety in F1, the passionate safety campaigner claiming that improvements could always be made.
"In Indy racing, there is simply nowhere to go," Mansell, who suffered a big hit with the wall in Phoenix at his second CART event before going on to take the series title, told BBC Radio 5Live, "When an accident happens, you are into the wall in a split second. This is why F1 does an exemplary job. The tarmac runs off so the driver has time to decelerate the car."
The Briton was particularly critical of the number of cars allowed to take the start in Las Vegas, with 34 drivers - one more than allowed at the blue riband Indy 500 - lining up for the finale. Wheldon's was the 34th entry, starting in place of the five 'all-stars' the series had hoped to tempt from other disciplines and chasing a $5m bounty if he could win from the back. The rest of the field was made up of seasoned IndyCar competitors, including those chasing the championship, and a number of younger, less experienced racers, some of whom were still in their first season in the series.
"To have 34 cars travelling at at 220mph on a mile-and-a-half long circuit, there are too many cars on the track," Mansell claimed, "The trouble is there are no small accidents when accidents happen. There were a number of rookie drivers and others driving in their first race of the season. The smallest mistakes turn into catastrophic ones and Dan was on the receiving end of it."
Stewart, meanwhile, pointed to modern thinking among race drivers, many of whom believe that there is little danger in making contact with rivals. IndyCar racing, on the ovals particularly, does not have too many instances of deliberate contact, but on-board footage often shows frightening wheel-banging moments of the sort that preceded the pile-up in Vegas.
"We had very few people colliding with each other in my period of racing and thereafter," Stewart, who frequently recalls the death rate in his era of F1, told BBC Radio Scotland, "Now it has become, somehow or other, acceptable and that is a warning.
"Yesterday's accident is sadly a terrible wake-up call and they have to recognise the risk is very real. I think there needs to be more discipline by the governing body. If drivers do consistently collide with each other, there should be heavier penalties. It should be marked down as something that just can't happen."
Click on relevant pic to enlarge
the conversation - Add your comment
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.