F1 »

Montezemolo again threatens Ferrari exit

Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo again tries to throw his weight around - but is it for real?
Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo appears to be revisiting an old tactic in a bid to pressure the powers-that-be within F1 to mould the sport more towards his way of thinking.

Over the years, the threat of a Ferrari withdrawal has been used to good effect in gaining concessions or benefits, and Montezemolo clearly believes that the time has come to try the same move over again as he seeks to gain changes within the sport that would play into his company's hands.

Speaking via the team's official website, the Italian at least admitted that F1 would probably not fall apart without the Prancing Horse, but insisted that he would be afraid to withdraw from the sport if the research Ferrari was putting into its road and race cars continued to be overshadowed by the reliance on aerodynamics. Likewise, he called for a return to in-season testing - something the Scuderia could clearly afford where others couldn't - and repeated his belief that running a third car would only be of benefit to the sport as a whole.

“F1 is still our life but, without Ferrari there is no F1, just as, without F1, Ferrari would be different,” he said, “We can be very patient, but there are precise conditions for us to continue with our work. We race not just for the publicity it brings us but, above all, to carry out advanced research aimed at all aspects of our road cars: engine, chassis, mechanical components, electronics, materials and aerodynamics, to such an extent that the technology transfer from track to road has grown exponentially over the past twenty years.

“What is not so good is that 90 per cent of performance is now based exclusively on aerodynamics and another negative is that ours is the only sport where no testing is allowed. We are building cars, not helicopters, rockets or planes. Sure, we must not go back to the excesses of a few years ago, but neither should we be in a position where we can't provide opportunities for the youngsters we are bringing on in the Ferrari Driver Academy.

"Finally, there's the issue of the third car which, mark my words, we support not so much for our own interests but more for those of the sport in general. We believe the interest of the fans, media and sponsors could increase if there is a bigger number of competitive cars on track rather than cars that are two or three seconds off the pace, being lapped after just a few laps. As an example, remember, in 1961, Giancarlo Baghetti won the French Grand Prix at Reims with a privately-entered Ferrari. There you are, it would be nice one day in the future to see one of our cars running in American colours, or Chinese, or maybe those of Abu Dhabi.”

Aware that he is likely to come in for some opposition, Montezemolo insists that he is views are just that - his views - but maintained the belief that F1 needs to look at the way in which it currently operates.

“We will support our views as we see fit, in the best way possible but, let's be clear, for those who agree, that is fine, but otherwise they will just have to accept it is our position," he concluded, "If F1 still wants Ferrari, it must change and go back to being at the cutting edge of research, while always keeping an eye on costs. We are not in F1 as sponsors, we are constructors.”

Veteran F1 journalist Joe Saward, meanwhile, raises the point that Montezemolo may just be using his views on F1 to raise his profile in other areas.

"While stirring up trouble in F1 with remarks about Ferrari quitting the sport, Ferrari boss Luca di Montezemolo may simply have been using the F1 as a way to keep his name in the newspapers," Saward wrote on his personal F1-themed blog.

Montezemolo is thought to be leading the race to replace current Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi if and when his government falls apart, and last week called for a 'government of national salvation' to save Italy from a possible debt crisis, putting forward a five-point plan to save the country from financial ruin.

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
29.10.2006 Monza, Italy, Luca Badoer (ITA), Test Driver, Scuderia Ferrari, Marc Gene (ESP), Test Driver, Scuderia Ferrari and Michael Schumacher (GER), Scuderia Ferrari - Ferrari World Finals, Monza
Felipe Massa (BRA), Scuderia Ferrari
Felipe Massa (BRA), Scuderia Ferrari
Fernando Alonso (ESP), Scuderia Ferrari
10.09.2011- Luca Cordero di Montezemolo (ITA), President Scuderia Ferrari
23.10.2016 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H
23.10.2016 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H
23.10.2016 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H
23.10.2016 - Race, Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal
23.10.2016 - Race, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H leads Max Verstappen (NED) Red Bull Racing RB12
23.10.2016 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H
23.10.2016 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H
23.10.2016 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H
23.10.2016 - Race, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H
23.10.2016 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H
23.10.2016 - Race, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H
23.10.2016 - Race, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H
23.10.2016 - Race, Pit stop, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

Caroline - Unregistered

November 08, 2011 2:23 PM

It was Montezemolo's RRA idea that brought in the ban on in-season testing, but now his team is being beaten he wants to change it ... Of course having a 2.5% extra schedule 10 payment would help his team afford more testing than his rivals. Why doesn't he buy a junior team like STR, instead of wanting to fill the grid up with compliant drivers in second string Ferraris, or would the degree of independence a junior team would have not fit in with the team orders plan. But then again mad Monty does think F1 fans spend Sunday afternoons at the beach ... I wonder what colour the sky is on Monty's planet.

purepix - Unregistered

November 08, 2011 2:15 PM

Yeah ok, it might all be a bit of "blah blah blah" for publicity, but his comments do make some sense. 1. We could do with some limited in season testing, particularly for rookies. 2. Most people agree better racing comes with less aerodynamic grip and more mechanical grip 3. What would be wrong with having customer cars?

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.