F1 »

McLaren opposed to Eclestone customer cars idea

Martin Whitmarsh has said that McLaren would be opposed to the introduction of 'customer cars' to F1 - but conceded that the team would have to become involved if the rules were opened up to permit them.

Despite establishing links with teams further down the F1 grid, McLaren would not back supplying rivals with complete cars, according to head man Martin Whitmarsh.

Responding to the latest suggestion from F1 ringmaster Bernie Ecclestone, who admitted that 'customer cars' may be a means of levelling the grid in times of economic struggle [see story here], Whitmarsh explained that it was not within McLaren's tenet for F1 to become a forum for buying and selling between teams.

“I think McLaren, philosophically, are not sure that customer cars are the right thing for the sport," he told a McLaren media phone-in, "It is a characteristic of F1, one of the features that differentiates it from other motorsport, to have teams as constructors, responsible for building and developing their own vehicles, and having the variety that comes from that."

The Woking team has enjoyed a 'technical partnership' with fellow Mercedes customer Force India for several years, has added a similar agreement with Marussia for 2012, and was once rumoured to be on the verge of supplying customer cars to Prodrive, only to have that deal scuppered by a clarification of the rules concerning such relationships.

As such, and despite his reservations, Whitmarsh conceded that, should the F1 regulations be opened up to allow the supply of customer cars, his team would be obliged to consider the possibility, both for its own business and the ongoing future of F1.

"We'd obviously have to look at it,” Whitmarsh acknowledged, "We have to be aware of the financial challenges of this sport, and it may be necessary, to either allow some of the smaller teams to survive or to allow new entrants to come in, for there to be an interim customer car allowance. However, we have to be careful that, while some teams may find [the idea] attractive, it may be a threat to the structure of the middle order teams, such as Williams and Force India, if customer teams were able, without the capital investment, to compete with them. It could damage the balance we currently have in the sport."

That said, however, Whitmarsh accepted the need for F1 to survive with a good field and a degree of competition between those taking part.

“We need at least 20 cars, and we need them to relatively competitive to put on a show, so we may have to resort to a variety of tactics to achieve that.”




Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Timo Glock - Marussia-Cosworth MR01
24.07.2011- Race, Jenson Button (GBR), McLaren  Mercedes, MP4-26 and Adrian Sutil (GER), Force India F1 Team, VJM04
04.03.2012 Lewis Hamilton (GBR), McLaren Mercedes MP4-27
06.05.2011- Friday Practice 2, Martin Whitmarsh (GBR), Chief Executive Officer Mclaren
25.11.2011- Friday Practice 2, Bernie Ecclestone (GBR), President and CEO of Formula One Management
01.03.2012 McLaren nose cone
27.07.2014- Race, Crash, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
27.07.2014- Race, The Safety car on the track
27.07.2014- Race, Crash, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07 and Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
27.07.2014- Race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
27.07.2014- Race, Crash, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07 and Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
27.07.2014- Race, Jenson Button (GBR) McLaren Mercedes MP4-29
27.07.2014- Race, Crash, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
27.07.2014- Race, Max Chilton (GBR), Marussia F1 Team MR03
27.07.2014- Race, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
27.07.2014- Race, The Safety car on the track
27.07.2014- Race, Jenson Button (GBR) McLaren Mercedes MP4-29
27.07.2014- Race, Max Chilton (GBR), Marussia F1 Team MR03 and Jules Bianchi (FRA) Marussia F1 Team MR03

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


stephen - Unregistered

March 12, 2012 6:15 PM

I think its quite clear what Martin is saying. They are not a good idea ideologically, but a good idea financially. So,while he wouldn't push for a rule change, he would supply if there was. Seems a reasonable standpoint to me



© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.