F1 »

Neale: McLaren will wait on FIA for Mercedes ruling

McLaren will not pursue protest as an option to uncover Mewrcedes' rear wing secrets, according to MD Jonathan Neale.
McLaren's Jonathan Neale has said that the Woking team will wait on motorsport's governing body to make a ruling on Mercedes' controversial rear wing, rather than make a direct protest.

The wing, which is thought to use the car's existing DRS system, specifically the movable section of the rear wing, to uncover a hole on the inside of the endplate, which then channels air to another section of the wing in search of extra speed. FIA technical delegate Charlie Whiting initially claimed that he saw nothing illegal with the innovation, but rival teams believe that, with the driver dictating when the DRS system is employed, it contravenes rules concerning movable aerodynamic devices. Sources in the Melbourne paddock suggested that, following further unproductive meetings with Whiting, several teams, led by Lotus and Red Bull, could be considering an official protest but, in the end, nothing came of it after Mercedes underperformed in the race.

While RBR boss Christian Horner continues to call for a clarification on the matter, Neale admits that McLaren will wait for the FIA to decide, despite obvious indications that Mercedes has something to hide, either about its front or rear wings.

"Mercedes were very quick during qualifying and there is enough YouTube footage of Michael [Schumacher] being very defensive about not having the car photographed under the front wing," he told the official F1 website, "But I think we have to rely on the FIA. All the teams are going to be trying to extract the maximum within the permitted regulations and innovation, particularly if a car is quick, certainly comes under challenge.

"We understand that well, but I don't understand well enough what Mercedes are actually doing and we have to rely on our colleagues at the FIA. We are all obliged, if we have anything that we think is innovative or pushing the interpretations of the regulations, to disclose that to Charlie Whiting and his colleagues. And I'm very confident that Mercedes will have done that and got a ruling that's okay. So it's interesting."

Horner, whose team has been the subject of numerous technical questions over the past couple of season, insists that Whiting needs to disclose why Mercedes' system falls within the letter of the law in order to prevent future unrest and possible protest.

"I think there are different interpretations of the rear wing of Mercedes," the RBR boss told Sky Sports, "We had some discussions with Charlie over the weekend and we chose not to protest it. There were other teams perhaps more animated than we were, but it is something we just want clarity on because one could argue it is a switch that is affected by the driver.

"The driver hits a button which uncovers this hole, and so it is driver activated, which is not in compliance with the regulations. I think there will be a lot of debate about it during the next five days, so we have requested there be more clarity on it because it is a grey area - and we need to [get clarification] before everybody charges around, committing considerable cost to development. If it is a clever idea and it is accepted, then fine, but it does seem to be somewhat grey at the moment."

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Christian Horner, Team Principal, Red Bull Racing
Nico Rosberg (GER), Mercedes GP
Jonathan Neale
Michael Schumacher (GER) Mercedes GP
01.03.2012 Nico Rosberg (GER), Mercedes AMG Petronas front wing and nose cone
04.03.2012 Michael Schumacher (GER), Mercedes AMG Petronas rear wing
Sebastien Ogier, Red Bull, RB7, F1 test [Credit: Red Bull Content Pool]
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB13
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB13

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

Calvin _

March 21, 2012 4:43 PM
Last Edited 1948 days ago

"...rely on the FIA..." well that would be a mistake then. Just how many times in the recent past have the FIA given a decision, only to reverse it not long after?

Toyah - Unregistered

March 21, 2012 11:59 PM

Personally, I can't see why they're all bickering. The whole purpose of F1 car design is to find those extra tenth's and exploit loopholes..... 6 wheeled Tyrell Ground-effects Lotus Turbo-charged Renault If a team finds a loophole and others don't, they'll be on the back foot for a few races but soon catch up.

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.