F1 »

Force India set for Aerolab appeal

Force India set to appeal against High Court ruling in IP case
Force India is set to appeal against a High Court Judgement into its intellectual property disagreement with Aerolab and the former Lotus Racing team.

The Silverstone-based team was awarded €25,000 in damages after a judge ruled that CAD files had been used as a shortcut in the design of the 2010 Lotus Racing car, with Aerolab having started work with the team shortly after its relationship with Force India broke down.

However, Force India – who were forced to pay Aerolab €850,000 in unpaid fees – are set to appeal against the ruling, arguing that the compensation awarded wasn't a representative of the breach that had occurred.

“I'm not confident [of getting a compensation increase on appeal], but we'll certainly go through the process,” deputy team principal Robert Fernley told GP Week. “The settlement is totally unrepresentative. You couldn't design a wheel nut for €25,000. Why are we spending £15 million for something we could do for €25,000?”

Rivals Marussia Racing are also reported to have spoken to the FIA about the ruling, given that the Lotus Racing – now running as Caterham – could be deemed to have broken rules regarding using the intellectual property of a rival team.

“The rules that we have to operate under are very strict and very clear in terms of what we have to do as a constructor,” sporting director Graeme Lowdon said, again in conversation with GP Week. “There are certain parts of the car that you have to design yourself and you have to own the IP to that.

“Unless I'm mistaken, the contents of part of this judgement suggest that there has been copyright infringement and if that's the case, it needs to be looked at and it needs to be looked at seriously because it's really fundamental to the integrity of the sport.

“There's potentially an awful lot of money at stake, but it goes beyond that. There's the reputation of a team, and all sorts of things. These rules are there to make sure we're all competing on the same basis.”



Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Lotus F1 scale model
07.09.2014 - Race, Romain Grosjean (FRA) Lotus F1 Team E22
07.09.2014 - Race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
07.09.2014 - Race, Adrian Sutil (GER) Sauber F1 Team C33 and Pastor Maldonado (VEN) Lotus F1 Team E22
07.09.2014 - Race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
07.09.2014 - Race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
07.09.2014 - Race, Max Chilton (GBR), Marussia F1 Team MR03 retires from the race
07.09.2014 - Race, Max Chilton (GBR), Marussia F1 Team MR03 retires from the race
07.09.2014 - Race, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
07.09.2014 - Race, Jenson Button (GBR) McLaren Mercedes MP4-29 and Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
07.09.2014 - Race, Jenson Button (GBR) McLaren Mercedes MP4-29 and Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
07.09.2014 - Race, Jules Bianchi (FRA) Marussia F1 Team MR03
07.09.2014 - Race, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari F14-T and Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
07.09.2014 - Race, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
07.09.2014 - Race, Jenson Button (GBR) McLaren Mercedes MP4-29 and Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
07.09.2014 - Race, Daniel Ricciardo (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB10 leads Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
07.09.2014 - Race, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07 leads Jenson Button (GBR) McLaren Mercedes MP4-29
07.09.2014 - Race, Jules Bianchi (FRA) Marussia F1 Team MR03 leads Romain Grosjean (FRA) Lotus F1 Team E22

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


cshatil - Unregistered

March 28, 2012 5:47 AM

I find it hard to believe that 1 malaysia were ignorant to the fact that aerolab included force india parts on the 1 malaysia car. all these highly paid technical staff, and not one raises an eyebrow. something stinks.......

Taz

March 27, 2012 10:34 PM

@Rob Not that I have to explain my reading habits to you but I read neither. The only publication I'll consider purchasing is Autosport. The Sun go into more detail....I can imagine :rolleyes: I'm sure they layed it out in crayon as usual. I'll wait and see until there's more info in a credible news source who's not interested in any old story to sell papers.



© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.