F1 » Montezemolo rails (again) against spending

Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo has called once more for a sense of urgency when it comes to tackling spending in F1.
Montezemolo rails (again) against spending

The impending need to finalise the details of the next Concorde Agreement has spurred Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo into another attack on the current levels of spending in F1.

Despite being one of the teams reportedly in good financial health, and with a band of loyal sponsors, Ferrari - and di Montezemolo in particular - have long railed against the sport's seemingly endless ability to find ways of consuming financial resources. Now, with several European nation's having sought financial help, Italy having been listed as the next possible seeker of a bail-out, and one of Ferrari's principal sponsors - Banco Santander - having had its credit rating downgraded, the Italian has again turned his wrath on the vested interests blocking a common goal.

"The world economic situation, and that of Europe in particular, is very serious and the world of F1 cannot ignore the fact," Montezemolo told the official Ferrari website,
"We cannot lose any more time: we need to tackle urgently - and with determination - the question of costs.

"Ferrari is in agreement with the FIA's position that drastic intervention is required. We are absolutely convinced that, as I have always said, the teams and the commercial rights holder must work together with the Federation on this front. This is no longer the moment for getting bogged down in sterile discussions or the meanderings of engineers, usually only concerned in defending the interests of someone or other: the question has to be tackled at the highest level, without further delay."

Although all twelve F1 teams have apparently agreed terms to sign up to the next Concorde Agreement [see story here], despite Mercedes and the three 'minnows' propping up the grid supposedly baulking at their treatment, the finer details of the deal have still to be firmed up, with the debate over cost-cutting and/or budget capping seemingly unresolved.

The existing Resource Restriction Agreement has been called into question amid suggestions that certain teams are bending the rules on its application or, in some case, on exceeding the spending limits it purports to control, and this has led to renewed calls for a more rigid structure for cost control. IN this respect, Ferrari has turned from poacher to gamekeeper, realising that it no longer necessarily has the resources to take on some of its bigger rivals. Discussions on a revised RRA, or whether the sport should be controlled by either a strict, FIA-policed, budget cap are ongoing, but reports believe that these need to be concluded by the end of the month in order to be approved by majority, rather than unanimous, vote.

Several teams, including Ferrari, have quit the body - FOTA - that previously presented a united front towards rule changes suggested by the FIA and Bernie Ecclestone, with the Italian giant the first to sign up to Ecclestone vision of the Concorde Agreement in return for several financial inducements and a place on the board of F1 shareholders.





Related Pictures

10.06.2012- Race, Fernando Alonso (ESP) Scuderia Ferrari F2012 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) McLaren Mercedes MP4-27
10.06.2012- Race, Start of the race
10.09.2011- Saturday Practice, Luca Cordero di Montezemolo (ITA), President Scuderia Ferrari
22.03.2013 - Atmosphere
21.03.2013- OZ Wheels and Pirelli Tyres
15.03.2013- Free Practice 2, Fans
Ferrari F138 launch [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]
Pedro de la Rosa. Ferrari F138 launch [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]
Jules Bianchi. Ferrari F138 launch [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]
Luca di Montezemolo. Ferrari F138 launch. [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]
Felipe Massa, Luca di Montezemolo, Fernando Alonso, Stefano Domenicali. Ferrari F138 launch. [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]
Felipe Massa. Ferrari F138 launch. [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]
Fernando Alonso, Stefano Domenicali and Felipe Massa. Ferrari F138 launch. [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]
Fernando Alonso, Stefano Domenicali and Felipe Massa. Ferrari F138 launch. [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]
Fernando Alonso and Felipe Massa. Ferrari F138 launch. [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]
Fernando Alonso and Felipe Massa. Ferrari F138 launch. [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]
Fernando Alonso and Felipe Massa. Ferrari F138 launch. [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]
Ferrari F138 launch. [Pic credit: Scuderia Ferrari]

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please do not post any personal abuse or attacks.

  • (this will never be displayed, but is required for email notification of follow-up comments)

    Email me when this topic is updated.

Note: Your comment may take a few minutes to appear

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


Calvin _

June 13, 2012 9:33 AM

Coming from one of F1's biggest spenders this smacks of discovering how much is being spent and what is being achieved. However, historically, Ferrari need to spend to get the performance.

Josh - Unregistered

June 13, 2012 9:56 AM

Of course any comments from Ferrari regarding spending are going to be met with unalloyed waves of cynicism, but I believe what Luca has said is right. With the current global economy it's not viable for teams to continue spending hundreds of millions each and every year.

I expect more comments like Calvin's, connecting Ferrari's concerns with lackluster on-track performance. Quite frankly I find this to be a very short sighted perspective.