F1 » Mercedes accounts show spiralling cost of F1

The latest corporate accounts from Mercedes lay bare just how expensive F1 has become, graphically revealing that the motorsports division spent a record £242.1 million in 2011.
Mercedes accounts show spiralling cost of F1
Mercedes' latest corporate accounts reveal that the cost to the car manufacturer of competing in F1 skyrocketed to a record £242.1 million in 2011. That's despite the running costs of the Mercedes F1 team actually falling slightly, down 0.2 per cent to £125.7 million.

That slight fall is nothing compared to the 54.2 per cent increase in spending on the engine division, however, which rose to a total of £116.4 million.

That's because of early research and development of the new V6 engines that will be required in 2014 after a period of relative stability in the rules and regulations. The accounts say that engine R&D spending alone jumped by £17.3 million to £52.4 million.

While Mercedes make money back on that investment by selling engines to other teams, it's still unlikely to make much of a return from the outlay. The engine department made a net profit of just £4.9 million in 2011, and after tax that ended up being a loss of £10.6 million.

The accounts show that the head count in the motorsports division rose by 78 staff to 989 in total, an overall wage bill of £60.1 million for the year. The costs don't include the likely sizeable outlay the team have since made on acquiring the driver services of Lewis Hamilton for the 2013 season.

The figures - allied to a lack of success in winning the championships - could well reveal the reason for the current managerial reorganisation underway at the team in recent weeks, as Mercedes look to stem financial losses while adding race wins.

Former director of motorsports at the team Norbert Haug was ousted after the 2012 season and former Williams F1 executive Toto Wolff hired as an executive director to replace him, along with the appointment of former world champion Niki Lauda as a non-executive chairman.

"I think the first point to be clear on is that Niki Lauda is in charge. He clearly doesn't understand the non-executive part of his title," said Sky Sports F1 analysis Ted Kravitz this weekend. "I understand that Lauda has even made it clear to [team principal] Ross Brawn that Brawn reports to him, and that he then reports to the Mercedes board."

That's not likely to have gone down well with Brawn, who won the 2009 world championship with Jenson Button driving for his eponymous team before Mercedes subsequently bought it up - especially with Wolff's appointment also threatening to sideline him.


Page 1 of 2
1 2  »




Related Pictures

Toto Wolff (pictured with future wife Susie in 2011) will head up Mercedes` racing arm from 2013
24.11.2012- Free Practice 3, Nikki Lauda (AU), Mercedes
22.11.2012- Ross Brawn (GBR), Team Principal, Mercedes GP
21.02.2012 Barcelona, Spain, Engine cover - Mercedes F1 W03 Launch
Mercedes badge on a truck in the paddock. 08.02.2013.
Nico Rosberg drives the new Mercedes F1 W04 [Pic credit: Mercedes
Mercedes sneak peak at F1 W04 [Pic credit: Mercedes]
Lewis Hamilton visits Mercedes headquarters in Stuttgart
Lewis Hamilton visits Mercedes headquarters in Stuttgart
Lewis Hamilton visits Mercedes headquarters in Stuttgart
Lewis Hamilton visits Mercedes headquarters in Stuttgart
Lewis Hamilton visits Mercedes headquarters in Stuttgart
Lewis Hamilton visits Mercedes headquarters in Stuttgart
Lewis Hamilton visits Mercedes headquarters in Stuttgart
Toto Wolff (pictured with future wife Susie in 2012) will head up Mercedes` racing arm from 2013
Toto Wolff (pictured with future wife Susie in 2011) will head up Mercedes` racing arm from 2013

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please do not post any personal abuse or attacks.

  • (this will never be displayed, but is required for email notification of follow-up comments)

    Email me when this topic is updated.

Note: Your comment may take a few minutes to appear

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


andrew2k

February 03, 2013 3:24 PM

A good reason as to why F1(and MotoGP)need a defined budget/spending cap and its a must in an uncertain economic climate and disappearing sponsorship.

Sadly though when you have teams like Mclaren, Ferrari and RB who have essentially cartelized the sport there is just no way I could see a budget cap happening.

In the end F1 really need to do something about the cost of competiting because the high budgets are not good for the sport as it essentially leads to small grids. If anything I would be disappointed if F1 were to go down the same road as MotoGP e.g. production bikes occupying the same grid as prototypes, in the case of F1 we see a indycar-type chassis occupying the same grid F1 chassis and all in an attempt to fill a disappearing grid.