F1 »

Brundle: Red Bull has lost Webber trust

Accepting that Red Bull was never going to 'sit back and wait for them to crash away a one-two finish', Brundle questioned why the team hadn't asked Vettel to drop back behind Webber, only to have team principal Christian Horner explain that as 'we had asked him to hold position and maintain a gap for three laps before he overtook, there was little point in asking him to reverse the move'.

David Coulthard, meanwhile, agreed that Webber had earned the right to win the Malaysian race, having made the right call to stop and change from Pirelli's intermediate tyre to a first set of slicks two laps later than Vettel – a move that gave him a lead he would not cede until Vettel passed him against orders. According to the Red Bull insider, the drivers were apparently told they could race until the last round of stops and would then have to hold position. Webber emerged fractionally ahead of Vettel as he left pit-lane and held onto the lead despite a concerted effort from the German to wrest it off him. It was two laps later that Vettel forced himself between the Australian and the pit-wall, forcing them to run side-by-side until turn four, where he finally completed his move.

Like Brundle, however, Coulthard could not see any punishment being meted out to Vettel, and expected the tension between the two Red Bull drivers to remain.

“If this was a poll of public opinion, you'd probably say Vettel has gone down a few points and Webber has gone up a few, but this is not a popularity contest,” he wrote in his BBC column, “This is not the first time that team-mates have fought over the same piece of turf, and it will not be the last. It will blow over like these things do - but there is no doubt that the next time Vettel and Webber go wheel-to-wheel we will all be holding our breath.”

Damon Hill also weighed in on the debate, suggesting that Vettel knew exactly what he was doing, instructions from the pit-wall notwithstanding, and figured that points in the bank more than out-weighed public criticism.

"I think Sebastian has taken the view that 'possession is nine tenths of the law, and we'll argue about it later',” the 1996 world champion commented, “There was clearly an understanding that they were on the edge with tyres, so the team had to think about how hard they were going to push - but Sebastian wasn't playing to that card. He's said sorry, but what is that really worth?”

John Watson, meanwhile, has called for Red Bull too suspend Vettel in a bid to re-establish just who calls the shots at Red Bull [ see separate story].

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
23.03.2013 - Damon Hill and Natalie Pinkham. Sky Sports F1
22.11.2012- David Coulthard (GBR)
24.03.2013- Race, the podium; winner Sebastian Vettel (GER) Red Bull Racing RB9, 2nd Mark Webber (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB9, 3rd Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W04
24.03.2013- Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Red Bull Racing RB9 overtaking Mark Webber (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB9
Martin Brundle. Sky Sports F1 press day. Feb 2012 [Pic credit: Sky Sports]
23.03.2017 - Steering wheel  Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Red Bull Racing RB13
23.03.2017 - detail Red Bull Racing RB13
23.03.2017 - Daniel Ricciardo (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB13
23.03.2017 - Mattia Binotto (ITA) Chief Technical Officer, Scuderia Ferrari and Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal
23.03.2017 - Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal
23.03.2017 - Cyril Abiteboul (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Managing Director and Alain Prost (FRA) Renault Sport F1 Team Special Advisor
23.03.2017 - Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17 and Guenther Steiner (ITA) Haas F1 Team Prinicipal
23.03.2017 - Jolyon Palmer (GBR) Renault Sport F1 Team RS17

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

FreeJack - Unregistered

March 25, 2013 5:32 PM

"Sorry" doesn't mean crap. Webber doesn't want an apology, he wants the points and the grand prix victory that he EARNED with his drive. People keep saying, "Well, Vettel apologized." Who cares? If someone stole $100 out of your wallet, didn't return it but said "Sorry," would you be satisfied with that?

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.