F1 »

Brawn speaks out on Pirelli test row

Ross Brawn has given his reasons why Mercedes acted in the way it did during the three-day Pirelli test that is causing consternation up and down the F1 pit-lane.
Mercedes team principal Ross Brawn continues to insist that there is no case for the Brackley-based squad to answer regarding its involvement in a controversial tyre test following the Spanish Grand Prix.

Speaking to BBC Sport ahead of the Canadian round this weekend, Brawn revealed further details of the test, including explaining why his team did not openly announce its involvement, and why he feels that it did nothing wrong, despite in-season testing – particularly with a current car – being in contravention of F1's sporting regulations.

There was no mention of the alleged green light from the FIA's Charlie Whiting to run the W04, but Brawn remains confident that Mercedes will be exonerated when it appears in front of a tribunal assembled by the governing body.

"It was a Pirelli test, on the Wednesday to Friday after the [Spanish] race,” he confirmed, “It couldn't be held any closer to the weekend because people were packing up. On the Tuesday, there were still motorhomes begin disassembled, garages being taken apart, and there we were, in our full regalia with the trucks and the Pirelli trucks and everything. There was no secrecy involved; it was privacy.”

Using the same reasoning to answer questions about why Nico Rosberg and Lewis Hamilton wore anonymous plain helmets for the 1000km test, Brawn maintained that he did not want to draw unwarranted attention to the session, even if there was no attempt to hide it from rivals within the F1 paddock.

"It was a Pirelli test, we don't believe we had an obligation to inform other teams - if Pirelli wanted to inform other teams, that's up to them,” Brawn argued, "We're comfortable it was a Pirelli test requested by Pirelli. It's for Pirelli to decide what they want to do with it.

"You don't go testing in Barcelona for three days and expect people not to know about it - my conscience is clear," he claimed, "The reason for the drivers' helmets is it was a Pirelli test, they organised the security, they organised all the arrangements.

"We didn't want to bring attention to the drivers, we didn't want to have to put security there, we didn't want to have to put minders [there]. The easiest way for us was to not bring attention to what drivers were in the car, [but] only for those reasons. We have always been very open about the drivers, [but] the drivers are irrelevant - there's nothing in the sporting regulations, nothing in the arrangements for these tests, that controls which drivers are in the car.”

It is the use of the W04, rather than Rosberg and Hamilton, that has raised eyebrows up and down the pit-lane, with several teams firmly believing that Mercedes – which was struggling to contain tyre wear with its 2013 car – will have gained a significant advantage from the test. Rosberg duly followed the test with victory in Monaco, but the acid test may well be this weekend's race in Montreal, which will tax the rubber much more than the streets of the Principality.

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
11.05.2013- Qualifying, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W04
12.05.2013- Pirelli Tyre
12.04.2013- Ross Brawn (GBR), Team Principal, Mercedes GP
Sahara Force India F1 VJM10 - Pirelli tyre.
The Sahara Force India VJM10 Mercedes
Mercedes W08 teaser shots
Mercedes W08 teaser shots
Mercedes W08 teaser shots
Mercedes W08 teaser shots
Mercedes W08 Hybrid, teaser image, F1 [Credit: Mercedes AMG Petronas]
Renault Sport F1 Team RS17 rear wing and Pirelli wheel.
Renault Sport F1 Team RS17 - Pirelli tyre and front wing detail.
Renault Sport F1 Team RS17 - Pirelli tyre.
Nico Rosberg and Fernando Alonso - Mercedes, McLaren
Chase Carey, Ross Brawn & Sean Bratches
George Russell, Mercedes junior programme, [Credit: Mercedes]
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


June 07, 2013 7:41 PM

"We didn't want to bring attention to the drivers, we didn't want to have to put security there, we didn't want to have to put minders "there. Brawn is now selling us the idea that Mercedes penny pinching on security was the reason Hamilton and Rosberg wore anonymous plain helmets . He did not want to draw unwarranted attention to the session. This would also involve muzzling the car too. Ridiculous defence .

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.