F1 » 1 July 2013
HAVE YOUR SAY: Who or what is to blame for F1 tyre shambles?
F1 tyres took centre stage again at the British Grand Prix, but where should the finger of blame be directed after the latest rash of high-profile failures?
Nico Rosberg may have taken an unexpected victory in the British Grand Prix, but it will be Pirelli and not Mercedes that gains most of the headlines - and not for the right reasons.
Although the action on track was entertaining enough, it will be the four highly-visible rear tyre failures - and another less well-publicised front failure - that will be the Silverstone talking point.
But who should the finger really be pointing at?
The uninitiated and gun-jumpers will almost certainly put Pirelli in the dock for what happened on a sunny Silverstone afternoon, the tyre company the easiest target as it was its products that gave out so spectacularly on the cars of Lewis Hamilton, Felipe Massa, Jean-Eric Vergne, Sergio Perez and Esteban Gutierrez, and almost did for both Rosberg and Fernando Alonso as well.
However, even as Pirelli investigates the cause of the failures - which it insists were different to those suffered in previous races and were not the result of its new tyre bonding process - other conspiracies were emerging.
Was it the kerbs at Silverstone, particularly those on the extension introduced in 2011? Alonso says he hadn't used them any differently to previous years, but some television pictures would have us believe that there were sharp edges just waiting to prey on unsuspecting tyres.
Was it the teams running the tyres a few PSI below Pirelli's recommendations, searching for those elusive tenths that may make all the difference to their result? Both Ferrari and Red Bull made no secret of telling their drivers that pressures had been increased in the sets they received after the first rash of failures....
Could it have been the weather which, for once bathed Silverstone in hot sunshine rather than cool, cloudy - and frequently wet - conditions? Did the higher temperatures combine with lower pressures and an abrasive track surface to produce the 'perfect storm' that provoked the failures?
Were the drivers to blame for taking that little bit extra while attempting to race each other, pushing their wheels beyond the limits of the track? Very few appeared willing to heed theit teams' warnings to stay off the kerbs after Hamilton and co had had their races wrecked...
Or, rather than looking for clues at Silverstone itself, should attention be switched to events prior to F1 returning to Europe? Pirelli wanted to introduce a revised tyre, with a kevlar band replacing the cheaper steel version that started the season. While the majority were in agreement, others - understandably seeking to retain an advantage with their 2013 cars - opposed the move, leaving F1 to carry on as it was.
Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Join the conversation - Add your comment
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.