F1 »

Teams didn't consider quitting at Silverstone

The tyre failures during the British Grand Prix prompted teams to consider ways of working around the issue, rather than pulling out of the race.
Despite speculation to the contrary, there appears little proof that any team considered withdrawing from the British Grand Prix as a result of the repeated tyre failures that affected Pirelli.

Mercedes, McLaren, Ferrari, Toro Rosso and Sauber all suffered problems during the race at Silverstone, but all insist that discussions on the pit-wall centred on what the sport's governing body, the FIA, may opt to do in light of the failures, rather than whether they should take pre-emptive action of their own.

“Yes, it was discussed on our pit-wall, [but] it was more a discussion focused around what we thought the FIA may do or may not do, rather than us actually making a decision to pull [our] cars out by themselves,” McLaren's Sam Michael confirmed, “It was more a discussion about what we should do in between that time, just in case that happened.”

Ferrari's Pat Fry echoed Michael's comments, explaining that the team preferred to pour its attention into working around the problems rather than ceding to them.

“I think, in that type of situation, it's always tricky and you've got to try to work out the best way to contain it,” he reasoned, “Silverstone is now the highest loaded circuit that we go to – it obviously used to be Indianapolis – and the type of failure, if you see it, was likely to be structural fatigue failure. So, the first thing you do is look at where people were getting to.

“I think Lewis broke on lap nine or eight, we failed on lap ten, someone got to lap 14. So, instantly, we were thinking 'well, you've got to minimise stint length'. We were advised by Pirelli to increase the pressures, which we did, and you try as much as you can to contain that situation. I think, from around the first round of tyre failures, we were always going to three-stop because that was a less risky way. To try and two-stop from there, you would be well past the mileage that the tyres were obviously failing at, so we tried to contain it that way.

“I think we were thinking of how we could contain it and make it as safe as we could rather than pulling out. There was some conversation with the FIA on the intercom about the tyre pressures we were running behind the safety car but, in the end, we just had to manage it.”

Fry also revealed that Pirelli's insistence that pressures needed to be raised as a safety measure ultimately had an effect on the performance of its F138s as, after a second request to increase, the car's pace dropped away..

Mercedes' Paddy Lowe confirmed that, having seen Hamilton lose the lead to the race's first failure, the team's priority was trying to work within the limitations presented by the situation.

“We were keeping a close eye on what the FIA might do in terms of a decision but, from our point of view, it was more a matter of management, whether through pressure or instructions to the driver about certain corners and kerbs and so on,” he said.

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
30.06.2013- Race, Sergio Perez (MEX) McLaren MP4-28 with rear left tyre exploded
30.06.2013- race, Felipe Massa (BRA) Scuderia Ferrari F138 with rear left tire exploded
30.06.2013- Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W04 with rear left tire exploded
Sauber C36 Ferrari
Sauber C36 Ferrari
Sauber C36 Ferrari
McLaren, 2011 launch, [Credit: Crash PA]
Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher and the 1996 Ferrari F310
Nico Rosberg and Fernando Alonso - Mercedes, McLaren
Antonio Giovinazzi - Ferrari SF15-T
George Russell, Mercedes junior programme, [Credit: Mercedes]
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Ayrton Senna - McLaren. 1993 Donington Park
Nigel Mansell - McLaren-Mercedes

Start the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.