27 August 2013
Whitmarsh: MP4-28 a misjudgement
Martin Whitmarsh has labelled this year's McLaren as a 'misjudgement' borne out of ambition at just the wrong point of the 2012 campaign, admitting that it is going to be hard to make it a success.
Martin Whitmarsh has admitted that, when McLaren finalised the design of its MP4-28, it was enduring a low point in its 2012 campaign and wanted to break the mould in a bid to improve this year.
Almost a complete redesign from its predecessor, the car has been problematic from its debut in pre-season testing and McLaren only overhauled Force India for fifth place in the constructors' championship at Sunday's Belgian Grand Prix. Neither Jenson Button – a three-time race winner last year – nor Sergio Perez has appeared on a podium this season, and McLaren has no answer to the likes of Red Bull, Mercedes, Ferrari or Lotus on track.
”We went aggressive with the height of the nose, the configuration of the front suspension, the configuration of the rear suspension, the bodywork and exhaust layout,” Whitmarsh confessed, “In a word, we did too many things which were deviating from a car which was the fastest car nine or ten months ago…”
Explaining the decision to make so many radical changes, Whitmarsh explained that McLaren was seeking to gain an advantage over teams it believed would be more conservative in their 2013 designs, but admits that the plan backfired owing to the Woking squad's own success.
“The time the team was making the decisions was in a situation when we were falling a bit behind,” he revealed, “The start of the 2012 season was good but then, in mid-season, we were falling behind and it is about that time that you make these decisions. Then last year's car became quicker and quicker.
“It was bad timing, it was misjudgement, and it was ambition. It is very clear in hindsight that we've got it wrong. Hindsight is a great thing to learn from, but it doesn't help right now.
“But let's also be fair: this car now is quicker than last year's car. So what we've done is made marginal steps forward but, effectively, we've lost about six months of time. The other teams - as we should have done - have developed their 2012 car and got ahead, and we slowly have to catch them up. We've done a little bit of that, but it's clearly not enough.”
While previous early season disasters have been turned around - notably in 2009, when Lewis Hamilton struggled at the start of his title defence before winning two races in the second half of the year – but Whitmarsh explains that it has been harder to correct the problems with the MP4-28.
“The weakness of McLaren - and this is probably my fault - is that we have not switched [enough] resources to the next year,” he revealed, “We fought and battled on for this season, as we are racers - that is our weakness. In the past, often we've been a bit late - we've come out slow and then put a foot on the gas. Often we've been in a situation where we've made a mistake, then we rectified that mistake and jumped forward. But, this year, the problem that we have with this car is that we are behind in development. You then push hard to accelerate development, you lose correlation from the wind tunnel to the track, you lose your way and it becomes difficult to make the progress that you want.”
Click on relevant pic to enlarge
the conversation - Add your comment
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.