F1 »

FIA Ethics Committee dismisses Ward protest

FIA presidential candidate David Ward has seen his complaints of alleged unfair practices carried out by rival Jean Todt's camp brushed away by the governing body's Ethics Committee.
The FIA's internal Ethics Committee has thrown out the concerns of British presidential candidate David Ward after he complained that rival – and present incumbent – Jean Todt had breached election rules by gaining support from automobile clubs in South America ahead of the agreed campaign period.

Ward, who is seeking to supplant Todt as president for the next four-year term, claims that the Frenchman 'jump started' the election race, in the process breaking rules that determine the fairness of the election. He subsequently made a formal complaint to the FIA's Ethics Committee regarding 'support letters' that emerged following a series of meetings Todt held in Latin America and Asia in early September.

Detailing his concerns on his official campaign website, Ward insists that 'the use of support letters well in advance of the presidential election period represents a serious breach of the FIA laws, rules and regulations', but the Ethics Committee, which met in Paris this week, saw fit to disagree, with Todt claiming that the widespread publication of these false allegations' allowed the findings of its discussion to be made public.

Despite two members of the original committee line-up – Briton Robert Jones and Brazilian Viviane Eleonora Monteiro, a personal friend of Todt's actress wife Michelle Yeoh – had decided to withdraw from their roles, and the head of the confederation being one of the signatories of a letter of support for Todt's candidacy, the board decided that 'nothing in what the [it] saw or heard gives any hint that any ethical regulation of the FIA has been breached by Mr Todt or any of the parties implicated'.

The committee also did not see any evidence of any kind supporting the allegation that people were coerced into signing the letters of support for Todt, claiming that, on the contrary, it had received numerous letters from individuals who attended the relevant meetings, albeit unsolicited, clearly showing that the letters of support were voluntary.

As a result, it saw no evidence of collusion of any kind by Todt or any of the parties implicated which would help to influence the results of the forthcoming election, pointing out that the 'Montevideo agreement' and 'Bangkok letter of support' were not binding on the clubs in any way – a fact admitted by Todt, who has 'acknowledged and asserted' that the presidential election will be decided by secret ballot.

The findings pointed out that Ward had asserted, several times, during the hearing that he was not suggesting any conspiracy or wrongdoing by Todt, and that his complaint had, instead, been about the FIA Statutes, in particular article 9.4, which requires a list of candidates to be provided including seven vice-presidents for sport. The committee questioned the decision to raise his point at this moment of the election process, as it is not their role to review such regulations.

Finding his options of naming a VP of sport from each region – as mandated by the election rules - limited by the written support given to Todt in Montevideo, Ward had branded the rules 'farcical' and producing an 'absurd situation in which just one club in North America may determine whether or not there can be a challenger to Jean Todt'.

The report concluded with criticism of Ward's decision to report the Frenchman's actions to them, claiming that he, as a 20-year FIA veteran who 'knows the legal framework very well' should also have known that it was inappropriate to challenge the regulations in such a way.


STOP PRESS: Ward has since issued his own response and has expressed his disappointment with the findings of the Ethics Committee [see separate story - HERE].




Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
08.09.2013- Jean Todt (FRA) Fia President
FIA presidential candidate David Ward [Pic credit: www.wardandteam2013.com]
FIA logo. 01.03.2013.
24.07.2014- Press conference, Kamui Kobayashi (JAP) Caterham F1 Team CT-04, Esteban Gutierrez (MEX), Sauber F1 Team C33, Marcus Ericsson (SUE) Caterham F1 Team CT-04, Jean-Eric Vergne (FRA) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR9, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07 and Pastor Maldonado (VEN) Lotus F1 Team E22
24.07.2014- Jean-Eric Vergne (FRA) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR9
20.07.2014- Patrick Dempsey (USA) Actor and David Coulthard (GBR)
20.07.2014- Race, Jean-Eric Vergne (FRA) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR9
20.07.2014- Race, Jean-Eric Vergne (FRA) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR9
20.07.2014- Race, Jean-Eric Vergne (FRA) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR9
20.07.2014- Race, Jean-Eric Vergne (FRA) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR9
20.07.2014- Race, Jean-Eric Vergne (FRA) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR9
19.07.2014- flags
19.07.2014- Free practice 3, Jean-Eric Vergne (FRA) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR9
19.07.2014- Free practice 3, Jean-Eric Vergne (FRA) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR9
Tom Kristensen (DEN) FIA Steward.
19.07.2014. Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 10, German Grand Prix, Hockenheim, Germany, Qualifying Day.
The post qualifying FIA Press Conference (L to R): Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Williams, second; Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1, pole position; Felipe Massa (BRA) Williams, third.
19.07.2014. Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 10, German Grand Prix, Hockenheim, Germany, Qualifying Day.
19.07.2014- Qualifying, Jean-Eric Vergne (FRA) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR9
Jean-Eric Vergne (FRA), Scuderia Toro Rosso  
19.07.2014. Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 10, German Grand Prix, Hockenheim, Germany, Qualifying Day.

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.




© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.