F1 »

Red Bull appeal success ‘would be bad for the sport’

Force India's Bob Fernley says “it would be bad for the sport” if Red Bull's appeal over Daniel Ricciardo's exclusion is upheld
Force India deputy team principal Bob Fernley says “it would be bad for the sport” if Red Bull is successful with its appeal of Daniel Ricciardo's exclusion from the Australian Grand Prix.

Red Bull will have its appeal heard in front of the FIA in Paris on Monday, with Ricciardo having originally been excluded in Melbourne for constantly exceeding the maximum permitted fuel flow. With the team believing Ricciardo's fuel flow sensor to have been faulty, Red Bull's case centres on the fact that guidance on what to do in such a situation came from an FIA technical directive, which it claims has no regulatory value.

However, speaking exclusively to Crash.net, Fernley said teams have often worked to technical directives and that the sport would be damaged if Red Bull is successful with its argument.

“It's difficult to tell really because you never know with a tribunal which way it's going to go,” Fernley said. “I think it wouldn't be healthy if the appeal was upheld – for the sport – because then I think you have a situation of anarchy that grows. We've lived for so long working to technical directives and if a technical directive is deemed not to be something that you have to adhere to then I don't know where Formula One goes.”

When it was put to Fernley that a similar argument was used by Mercedes during the tyre test tribunal, he said he believes the two situations are not comparable.

“I think that was a different issue. This was a direct contravention of a directive. The tyre test was a lot of grey areas, whereas this is a direct, head-on rebuttal of a directive really and they're deeming it not legal.

“For all the years that I've known a technical directive the teams have all complied to, and in fact the same thing happened of course in Australia because ten teams complied to it and one didn't. So I think it would be bad for the sport if the appeal was upheld.”




Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
06.04.2014- Race, Daniel Ricciardo (AUS) Infiniti Red Bull Racing RB10
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Pastor Maldonado (VEN) Lotus F1 Team E22 stopped on the track
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Andre Lotterer (GER), Caterham F1 Team
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W05
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Romain Grosjean (FRA) Lotus F1 Team E22
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Red Bull Racing RB10
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Romain Grosjean (FRA) Lotus F1 Team E22
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Felipe Massa (BRA) Williams F1 Team FW36
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W05
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W05
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W05
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W05
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W05
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Daniel Ricciardo (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB10
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Williams F1 Team FW36
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Adrian Sutil (GER) Sauber F1 Team C33
22.08.2014- Free Practice 2, Felipe Massa (BRA) Williams F1 Team FW36

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


Fullofit

April 11, 2014 11:47 AM

107SS2009: Taz, I have no problem with that, those disagrees will in no way influence my opinion of what is right and what is wrong, hope you do not doubt all that.
As long as you accept that just because it's YOUR opinion it doesn't automatically make it correct ... which HASN'T been the case case up to this point. A great example is the first post, calling anyone who disagrees a fool. Now THAT is arrogance.

Taz

April 11, 2014 11:50 AM
Last Edited 130 days ago

@Sunny I do think red bull are most likely in the wrong but to call anyone who disagrees with your opinion a fool is a little arrogant you have to admit.



© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.