F1 »

Manufacturers seek to entice Todt with cheaper engines

Manufacturers are set to reduce the price of its engines for customer teams as a way of avoiding the introduction of a 'customer engine', according to reports.
Formula 1's engine manufacturers are set to propose a substantially reduced cost for its hybrid power units as a way of avoiding the FIA and FOM's attempts to introduce a cheaper independent engine supply.

In the wake of Ferrari vetoing cost cap measures in October 2015, the FIA initiated a new proposal that would see an independently-developed engine being made available to teams at a lower price than the reported 16-20 million euros being charged to customer teams by Mercedes, Ferrari, Renault and Honda.

Though the proposal went as far as a tendering process, the plan was put on hold in November when manufacturers agreed to co-operate on an alternative plan to primarily reduce costs and improve the spectacle.

With the proposal due for 15th January, according to German publication Auto Motor und Sport, manufacturers have agreed to a rounded price reduction to around 12 million euros in an effort to avoid a customer engine, which would have been built to a different specification before being equalised in terms of performance.

The move is intended to entice Todt, who remains a supporter of the hybrid power unit formula and whose key motivation for the alternative engine is being driven by the vast costs.

When discussing the proposal during the Mexico Grand Prix weekend, Todt suggested costs could be reduced to around 12 million euros, though engines argued this would be difficult. Nonetheless, this move has the potential to win him round, which could effectively signal the end of the alternative proposal.

Such a move would likely irk Bernie Ecclestone, who has been – and remains – a staunch critic of the engines, which he feels don't provide enough spectacle in terms of power or noise.

Even so, Todt and Ecclestone could yet make a bid for tweaks having been given a 'mandate' to forge ahead with proposals on 'pressing issues', which many felt was a veiled nod to the engine proposals if teams and manufacturers rejected it. Todt and Ecclestone have until 31st January to 'express their intention to establish conclusions on these matters'.


Tagged as: Ferrari , Honda , Mercedes , Renault

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
19.04.2015 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W06 leads Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF15-T
25.06.2017 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, The Safety car and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM010 and Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
25.06.2017 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 and the Safety car
25.06.2017 - Race, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
25.06.2017 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
25.06.2017 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
25.06.2017 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
25.06.2017 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.06.2017 - Race, 1st place Daniel Ricciardo (AUS) Red Bull Racing RB13, 2nd place Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 and 3rd place Lance Stroll (CDN) Williams FW40
25.06.2017 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
25.06.2017 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
25.06.2017 - Race, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


Taz

January 12, 2016 10:40 AM

Erm....."though engines argued this would be difficult" Yikes...the engines can talk for themselves now??? these hybrid units are self aware, No wonder they cost so much.

mrfill

January 12, 2016 11:58 AM

Taz: Erm....."though engines argued this would be difficult" Yikes...the engines can talk for themselves now??? these hybrid units are self aware, No wonder they cost so much.
You bad, bad man. You got in first..... I had a Renault once that talked to me. The last conversation was on the M25. "Your turbo has been deposited on the highway. Please stop now"



© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.