F1 »

Drivers pushing for cockpit protection by 2017

The FIA should be looking at intrdoucing cockpit protection as soon as next season if it is serious about its desire to improve safety, says Alex Wurz.
Drivers want to see increased cockpit protection introduced to motorsport by next year in an effort to take the sport into a new era of driver safety, according to Grand Prix Drivers' Association president Alex Wurz.

The topic of closed, or protected, cockpits has been on the agenda for some years, but the topic has gained more prominence in recent years following the deaths of Jules Bianchi and Justin Wilson.

Though it was considered Bianchi, who died nine months after striking a recovery vehicle during the 2014 Japanese Grand Prix, would not have been saved by cockpit protection, it is felt Wilson's death - when he was struck by errant debris during an IndyCar race at Pocono - could have been avoided.

Since Bianchi's death, the FIA has looked into several methods of cockpit safety, though this was brought further to the fore after Wilson's death in August 2015, with drivers raising their voice about the need for increased cockpit protection.

Ex-McLaren and Williams driver Wurz, who retired from racing in November 2014 to focus on his GPDA role, says he has been impressed by the 'thorough' research done on this, but feels the time to take the plans from concept to reality as early as 2017.

"The research the FIA experts have done is very thorough and the process has brought forward a clear solution," he told the BBC. "Now the drivers feel it's time to implement the extra protection at the latest in 2017."

"Obviously structural changes are required to the chassis but, with almost a one-year lead time, I don't see any technical person speaking against such substantial safety improvements, especially given the last big accidents in open-wheel racing involved head injuries. So all the drivers, and I, hope that passing the additional head protection will be a formality."

It is believed the 'halo' concept, which sees a ring above and ahead of the driver with a central supporting strut ahead of the eye-line is considered the most favourable solution amongst drivers. It is feared an entirely closed cockpit presents others risks to drivers in terms of post-crash recovery.

A number of drivers have aired their support for such a move, with Jenson Button admitting he has changed his opinion towards the use of closed cockpits in the wake of Wilson's tragic death.
by Ollie Barstow



Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
29.11.2015 - Race, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W06
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Romain Grosjean (FRA) Haas F1 Team VF-16
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Romain Grosjean (FRA) Haas F1 Team VF-16
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren Honda MP4-31
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Kevin Magnussen (DEN) Renault Sport F1 Team RS16
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren Honda MP4-31
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Esteban Gutierrez (MEX) Haas F1 Team VF-16
30.09.2016 - Free Practice 2, Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


richard

January 25, 2016 3:36 PM

vincero. i agree. jules' injuries were NOT caused by any intrusion. they were as a result of the massive decelleration, so the cockpit protection would have been absolutely no benefit to him

WYNK

January 25, 2016 2:48 PM

I doubt the design shown/described would have saved Justin Wilson God rest him. And thinking about it, any argument between such a structure and an earth-mover like Bianchi hit would usually favour the earth-mover. This is going to take some serious thinking.



© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.