F1 »

F1 British GP: Horner: Radio rule rubbish… but rules are rules

Christian Horner bemoans the radio communication rules as 'rubbish', but feels Mercedes is right to be punished for breaching them.
Christian Horner says Mercedes and Nico Rosberg are right to be punished by the FIA for their radio communication transgression during the British Grand, even if he says he finds the regulation itself to be 'rubbish'.

A gearbox problem for Rosberg in the closing stages of the Silverstone race would force Mercedes to relay information over the radio to its driver so as to contain it and avoid a DNF. With Rosberg going on to finish the race in second place, an investigation by the stewards would result in a 10secs time penalty being applied, dropping him to third.

The first time a penalty has been enforced by the stewards for breaching the controversial rule, which came into force at the start of the season, though Mercedes has argued it didn't do anything wrong – and is thus appealing Rosberg's penalty -, Red Bull team principal Horner has less sympathy despite his own misgivings of the regulation.

“First of all, I think the rule is rubbish,” he said speaking before the penalty was handed down. “It doesn't make a great deal of sense, but the rules are the rules and on two counts, it sounds like instructions were given that breached that protocol. One was the switch change that was made and then the second was on how to drive the car with the seventh gear issue that they had.

“The cars are technically very complex and you can understand why Mercedes would want to give that message to keep their driver running. Now it is a team sport at the end of the day and the cars are a lot more complicated than they were even four years ago for the drivers to be able to work out what they should and shouldn't be doing.”

Crucially, the ruling potentially sets a precedent for future offences, with some teams potentially considering a time penalty worth risking if it means a driver can avoid a DNF.

“What will be interesting to see is the precedent that the stewards now come up with because if it is just a 5-sec penalty or a reprimand, it is all fair game for the rest of the year and there will be loads of messages, where we will take into account, whether or not it is worth 5 seconds or not, or a reprimand given to the car.

“I think what will be interesting to see is the precedent that is set by Charlie and the stewards because they made it very clear, explicitly clear, going into this weekend what their expectations were.”

Red Bull was a big beneficiary of Rosberg's penalty, with Max Verstappen being elevated to second place.
by Ollie Barstow



Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
10.07.2016 - Race, Max Verstappen (NED) Red Bull Racing RB12 and Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Max Verstappen (NED) Red Bull Racing RB12
29.09.2016 - Max Verstappen (NED) Red Bull Racing RB12
29.09.2016 - Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Nico Hulkenberg (GER) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
29.09.2016 - Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid
29.09.2016 - Max Verstappen (NED) Red Bull Racing RB12

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


DamZen1

July 11, 2016 11:04 AM

That was costly for Nico, he's drove cars long enough to know that if a gear isn't working then shortshift through it. the chassis setting was blatant cheating when you think back they wouldn't give Hamilton the setting needed so they knew the rule

Yirmin

July 11, 2016 7:34 PM

In the end the big loser in all of this will be the fans. You will go to a race, watch the race, watch the podium ceremony.... And then later that evening you'll see the final result shaken up on a regular basis because X spoke on the radio and got 10 second, Y spoke twice and got 20 seconds added on and so on until you will end up with fans simply saying what's the point of even watching when the results will be decided by a few stewards after the race is done and the trucks are moving out.



© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.