F1 »

F1 German Grand Prix: Too many unknowns to support Halo, says Grosjean

Romain Grosjean confirms he is against the introduction of the 'Halo', saying it is against the 'DNA' of F1 and is untested in race conditions.
Romain Grosjean says there are number of reasons as to why he is personally against the introduction of a 'Halo' cockpit protection device, saying it is against the 'DNA' of F1 and there are still too many untested potential pitfalls.

Ahead of a key vote amongst team bosses at a Strategy Group meeting this weekend in Hockenheim, the 'Halo' concept is still dividing opinion, with Jenson Button, Nico Rosberg and Daniel Ricciardo amongst those in support, while Lewis Hamilton and Nico Hulkenberg have shown resistance.

READ: Button puts faith in teams over Halo decision

It is within the latter grouping that Haas driver Grosjean falls into, the Frenchman declaring the device goes 'against the DNA' of F1 before adding that it hasn't been tested for factors such as wet conditions, undulating venues and night-time visibility in places like Singapore.

“I don't want to stop safety in Formula One and it's great, but if we're racing drivers then we make a choice to come into a dangerous sport and I'm not at all in favour of the Halo,” he confirmed. “I think it goes against the DNA in Formula One, against what I've seen as a kid or since it started in 1950. On top of that there has been a few downsides.

“We don't know what it's going to be like when it's raining; we don't know what it's going to be like on a track like Spa-Francorchamps where you're up and down; we don't know what it's going to be like in Singapore with the lights and the Halo; we've already got issues with the weight; and it's ugly. If it comes, fine. But again if I had to vote I would vote against.”

FEATURE: Race Invaders – The bizarre tale behind Rubens Barrichello's maiden F1 win

Though Grosjean says is introduction would stop him from racing in F1, he feels the sport does enough in the advancement of safety without this device.

“Well we would get used to it and we would go around. But it's clearly not making the cars look faster and stronger and more difficult to drive. I think Formula One has already had the head in the air and that's part of the enjoyment for a racing driver.”

“We've seen the research, it's been very well done, it's great, the results are great but again for me the pros and the cons, it just doesn't work.”

PLAY: Which F1 driver are you…?



Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
28.07.2016 - Romain Grosjean (FRA) Haas F1 Team VF-16
28.07.2016 - Romain Grosjean (FRA) Haas F1 Team VF-16
28.07.2016 - Romain Grosjean (FRA) Haas F1 Team VF-16
23.07.2016 - Autograph session, Romain Grosjean (FRA) Haas F1 Team VF-16
23.07.2016 - Free Practice 3, Romain Grosjean (FRA) Haas F1 Team VF-16
22.07.2016 - Free Practice 1, Romain Grosjean (FRA) Haas F1 Team VF-16
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
French Grand Prix at Paul Ricard
Lando Norris, McLaren Autosport BRDC Awards [Credit: Martyn Pass PR]
Kimi Raikkonen tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Lewis Hamilton tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Daniel Ricciardo tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Kimi Raikkonen tests the 2017 F1 tyres in Abu Dhabi [credit: Pirelli]
Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes, Pirelli 2017 tyre test [Credit: Pirelli]
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner

Start the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.




© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.