F1 »

F1 Japanese GP: Perez worried Force India deal was ‘not going to happen’

After months of negotiations, Sergio Perez explains why his Force India deal took so long and why he was worried it wouldn't happen.
Sergio Perez has spoken of his relief at formally confirming his plans to stay with Force India for the 2017 Formula 1 season after protracted negotiations left him concerned the deal would fall through.

A two-time podium winner in 2016, though Force India boss Vijay Mallya has long suggested Perez was signed for next year, full confirmation was dependent on a new extension being agreed between the team and his Mexican sponsors.

REVEALED: The cause of Lewis Hamilton's Malaysian GP engine failure

However, while Perez had hoped to have his one-year deal in place by August, he admits the length of the talks left him increasingly concerned that he would be forced to look elsewhere at this relatively late stage.

“It's something less to worry [about] for the [rest of] the races of the year,” he said. “It's always good to know what you are doing in your future, and it's good, now I can get on totally with the job. There are five races left, they are really important for the team and hopefully we can keep on doing the job we are doing the whole season.”

“The uncertainty of what's going to happen [was a distraction]. Because I came to a point where I was seriously considering it's not going to happen, it took very long, as my deals are a bit more complex than others. But especially because it was so long, it was probably the last three months not knowing where my future will be.

BEST OF ENEMIES: F1's Biggest and Bitterest driver rivalries

“It's not the best but at the end of the day I think I coped with it well. I am used to dealing with that, the rumours, uncertainty of the future and I think that helped me, what I lived in my past, to try to stay focused on my job.”

Indeed, though Renault is rumoured to have approached about switching for 2017, Perez maintains his primary aim was always to stay with Force India out of both loyalty and stability.

“We were not looking anywhere else. We had other options, other teams were interested on having me but always the Plan A was to stay here.

“I wanted the stability. Loyalty as well played an important role on this, because this team has been extremely good for me and my career. Going into a new generation of rules, all I wanted was to have some stability and not move around too much and obviously it was a one year option, so I want to see where we are next year and what's available for the future.”

POINTS: F1 World Championship Standings ahead of the Japanese GP

Latest Tweets from Crash.net & GPF1rst

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
18.09.2016 - Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
18.09.2016 - Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM09
24.05.2017 - Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
24.05.2017 - The paddock
24.05.2017 - Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
24.05.2017 - Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
24.05.2017 - Monte Carlo Atmosphere
24.05.2017 - Guenther Steiner (ITA) Haas F1 Team Prinicipal and Claudio Albertini, Ferrari Head of Customer Teams Power Unit Operations
24.05.2017 - Mattia Binotto (ITA) Chief Technical Officer, Scuderia Ferrari
24.05.2017 - Marcus Ericsson (SUE) Sauber C36
24.05.2017 - Kevin Magnussen (DEN) Haas F1 Team VF-17
24.05.2017 - Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
24.05.2017 - Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
24.05.2017 - Scuderia Ferrari SF70H, detail
24.05.2017 - The motorbike of Lewis Hamilton (GBR)
24.05.2017 - Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
24.05.2017 - Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
24.05.2017 - Scuderia Ferrari SF70H, detail

Start the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.