F1 »

F1 Brazilian GP: Ferrari, Vettel Mexican GP appeal attempt thrown out

Ferrari's attempt to get Sebastian Vettel's Mexican Grand Prix penalty overturned is thrown out.
The results for the 2016 Mexican Grand Prix have now been officially confirmed after Ferrari's attempt to reverse Sebastian Vettel's post-race penalty was thrown out.

Vettel was demoted from third to fifth following the Mexican Grand Prix as punishment for 'moving under braking' in defence of Daniel Ricciardo.

Though FIA Race Director Charlie Whiting attended Thursday's press conference to explain the reasoning for th penalty, Vettel in the same session flatly denied he did anything wrong. In the hours afterwards, Ferrari proceeded to submit a request for the case to be reviewed based on a 'new element' it did not disclose at the time.

However, following a teleconference with the stewards from Mexico, the FIA dismissed Ferrari's case, saying the 'new element' of GPS data had no basis because it was available to stewards as well. It also said it made no difference to Vettel's actions of moving under braking.

The full FIA statement is below

“The Stewards of the 2016 Mexican Grand Prix convened a hearing today at 1645 hrs Brazil Time, to hear a request from the Entrant of Car 5, Scuderia Ferrari, to review the decision in Document 38 from that event.

“The request was lodged in accordance with Article 14.1 of the FIA International Sporting Code. The hearing was conducted by teleconference. Scuderia Ferrari was represented by Mr Jock Clear.

“Red Bull Racing was represented by Mr Christian Horner and Mr Jonathan Wheatley. Scuderia Ferrari argued in its written submission that the “new element”, in accordance with Article 14.1, existed. In its verbal submissions it also argued that there were two “new elements”.

“Specifically the Scuderia argued that the Race Director, pursuant to Article 27.4 of the FIA Formula One Sporting Regulations, had the “power” to instruct the driver of Car 33 Max Verstappen, to give back the alleged advantage he had gained when leaving the track on a previous lap to that of the incident involving Car 5 and Car 3 driven by Daniel Riccardo. Scuderia Ferrari also argued that the GPS data it presented was a “new element”.

“The Stewards heard extensive verbal submission and argument for all parties. In relation to the matter of the Race Director having the “power” to instruct the driver of Car 33 to give back the alleged advantage, we note firstly that the relevant article gives the Race Director “absolute authority” to allow the driver to give back a position. It does not imply an obligation to do so. The fact that the Race Director did not exercise his discretion is not relevant to the decision taken in Document 38.

“In relation to the GPS data we note that this data is available to teams during the race. It is also available to, and referred to by, the stewards, in the Stewards Room during the race.

“When asked if the GPS data in any way contradicted the telemetry and other evidence that the Stewards concluded showed that the driver of Car 5 had steered whilst under braking at Turn 4, Mr Clear conceded that it did not.

“Article 14.2 of the International Sporting Code gives the Stewards the sole discretion to determine if a new element exists. Having received all the written and verbal submissions and carefully considered them, the Stewards decide there is no new element.”

Latest Tweets from Crash.net & GPF1rst

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
11.11.2016 - Free Practice 1, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H
23.03.2017 - Detail  Sauber C36
23.03.2017 - Detail  Sauber C36
23.03.2017 - Detail  Sauber C36
23.03.2017 - Carlos Sainz Jr (ESP) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR12 and Daniil Kvyat (RUS) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR12
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - detail  Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
23.03.2017 - Steering wheel  Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Williams F1 Team FW38
23.03.2017 - detail Sahara Force India F1 VJM010
23.03.2017 - detail Red Bull Racing RB13
23.03.2017 - detail Red Bull Racing RB13
23.03.2017 - detail Mercedes AMG F1 W08
23.03.2017 - Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Mercedes AMG F1 W08

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


November 12, 2016 4:40 AM

... and I've been trying to post on the Crash article about why Hamilton was not penalized for cutting thru the grass at T1 and it won't post so here it is... Hamilton always gets special treatment. If Vettel had done that, then they would have heavily penalized him. And Seb isn't in the running to win the Championship even. This is not fair. Hamilton was able to completely avoid damaging his car by not fighting for the first several turns AND got to stay in 1st place. BIG advantage. This guy is fighting for 1st place in the championship. Nico might have ended up in 1st place after the first few turns of the race had Hamilton not DRIVEN STAIGHT THROUGH the grass, avoiding 3 turns. 80% throttle my ass. Nico is fighting to be the champion. Nico has been cheated. Hamilton is always handled with kid gloves. NOT FAIR! Its the Championship we're talking about. Why is Hamilton never penalized?

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.