F1 »

More F1 drivers against ‘Halo’ than for it

The FIA asks drivers for their opinion on the divisive 'Halo' cockpit protection device with more coming out against its introduction.
Plans to introduce a cockpit protection device for the 2018 Formula 1 season have come up against a potential stumbling block after drivers voted as a majority against it.

The divisive concept came close to being introduced for 2017 as part of this year's revised technical package but was deferred to 2018 after team bosses agreed it required more research and development.

FEATURE: In tribute to Manor, we salute F1's most dogged underdogs

With all teams being invited to trial the prototype during free practice sessions up to the end of the 2016 season, development was expected to continue into 2017.

However, despite vocal support from a number of high profile drivers throughout 2016 – including now retired champion Nico Rosberg -, an informal vote taken by the FIA of last year's 22 drivers reveals it is not finding favour.

According to Auto Motor und Sport, of the 16 responses received, five spoke out in favour of the device being introduced, with seven against and four indifferent.

OPINION: Should these drivers be racing in F1?...

Though the vote isn't official or binding, the opinions are likely to be taken into consideration when the FIA determines whether to go ahead with development, shelve it or take time to explore more device options, such as Red Bull's 'Aeroscreen'.

As well as Rosberg, Daniel Ricciardo and Lewis Hamilton have all spoken up in favour of the Halo, while Nico Hulkenberg, Jolyon Palmer and Kevin Magnussen have expressed opposition.


Latest Tweets from Crash.net & GPF1rst





Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
25.11.2016 - Free Practice 1, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H with Halo.
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 pole position
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Press conference, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 and Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Press conference,  Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 and Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Press conference, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 and Valtteri Bottas (FIN) Mercedes AMG F1 W08
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 pole position
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 pole position
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 pole position
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W08 pole position
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Kimi Raikkonen (FIN) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H and Daniil Kvyat (RUS) Scuderia Toro Rosso STR12
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Sergio Perez (MEX) Sahara Force India F1 VJM010
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Fernando Alonso (ESP) McLaren MCL32
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Esteban Ocon (FRA) Sahara Force India F1 VJM10
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Scuderia Ferrari SF70H
25.03.2017 - Qualifying, Max Verstappen (NED) Red Bull Racing RB13

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


richard

February 02, 2017 2:11 PM

well no. it should either be required or not. but funny how it is the more experienced and faster drivers that want it, but the slower ones who have not even tried it, are the ones to say "no way".



© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.