F1 »

Phillips admits to FIF1-Mercedes talks.

While Adrian Sutil might have dismissed suggestions that Force India is in talks with Mercedes-Benz about a technical alliance next season, marketing man Ian Phillips has admitted that the team has to explore all avenues as Formula One embarks on a new technological era.

The 2009 campaign ushers in a raft of rule changes, among them the opportunity to incorporate KERS systems on the next generation of car. Although next season's regulations do not insist on the systems being fitted, and not every constructor is up to speed with their development, Phillips admits that Force India, as one of the grid's smaller teams, really has no option to but to cast around and see which package suits it best.

The team's case is heightened by the fact that current engine supplier Ferrari appears to be lagging behind many of its rivals when it comes to implementing a KERS system and may not be in a position to introduce it until midway through the year, while others - including Mercedes-supported McLaren - have already had their systems out on track.

"There is a lot of tittle-tattle at this time of year," Phillips admitted during his stint on the BBC's Radio Five Live broadcast from Fuji, "However, although the KERS system will be allowed in 2009, even if it's not compulsory, there are areas of the packaging of the car that have to be finalised.

"Ferrari don't want us to develop our own system [to go with their engines], but are being a bit non-committal about whether they are even going to start the season with KERS. Force India has to build a new car for the new regulations, and can't afford to build a non-KERS car and then have whoever turn around and say that KERS will be available from July or whatever.

"Ferrari is unable to say what it is going to do, or whether it won't be running KERS until the third or fourth race of the year, so it is only natural that we have to go and ask everyone else about what they are up to.... Nobody really knows what is happening at this stage, but three or four teams have embryonic systems, and the end of October is really the time when we have to put a line under our chassis design."

Ironically, Phillips went on to say that he had been told that running without KERS in 2009 might give Force India the best chance of success, but admits that the team cannot afford to shun the technology.

"One team's technical leader told me that a non-KERS car would probably win the championship next year," he revealed, "and there is an argument that, without KERS, you could design the ultimate in wheelbase, chassis, weight distribution, etc. You could probably qualify brilliantly with it too, but the KERS cars, if they used their extra horsepower off the line, would overcome that..."

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Adrian Sutil (GER) Force India VJM01, Japanese F1, Fuji, 10th-12th, October, 2008
Sauber C36 Ferrari
Sauber C36 Ferrari
Sauber C36 Ferrari
Michael Schumacher and the 1996 Ferrari F310
Nico Rosberg and Fernando Alonso - Mercedes, McLaren
Antonio Giovinazzi - Ferrari SF15-T
George Russell, Mercedes junior programme, [Credit: Mercedes]
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Force India reveals the launch date for its 2017 F1 challenge
Nigel Mansell - McLaren-Mercedes
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes, Pirelli 2017 tyre test [Credit: Pirelli]
27.11.2016 - Race, Celebration, 2nd place Nico Rosberg (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid and Champion 2016 and Lewis Hamilton (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1 W07 Hybrid race winner

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

JJ - Unregistered

October 10, 2008 12:35 PM

In motorsports, when some new regulations are introduced but not obligatory, there are always people saying ''without it you''ll be faster''. However, in reality this will never be the case, sometimes because it just plain isn''t true, and otherwise because the regulators make it so it isn''t true. This will especially be the case with KERS, because the FIA and almost everyone else needs the KERS-car to be quicker than a non-KERS car. Remember when MotoGP introduced the 1000cc 4-stroke bikes but the 500CC two-strokes were still allowed? Some people said it would be about equal and the two-strokes would have an advantage at some tracks. Obviously that wasn''t the case...

brendan - Unregistered

October 10, 2008 3:13 PM

thats true, a 500 could out qualify a 1000cc on occasion but never beat in a race. due to the extra cc it could then just block a 500 in the bends. and blow it away down the straight

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.