F1 »

Japanese GP - Friday press conference - Pt.1.

Press conference

Hiroshi, can you tell us about the 'Make Cars Green' initiative?

Hiroshi Yasukawa:
Actually, for us, the environment and ecology is very important and fortunately we at Bridgestone are working with the FIA, not only in motorsport but also the road safety campaigns, and now we are going to start this campaign. We are very happy working together and everybody has to have concerns about ecology and the environment and the car manufacturers are always producing very good technologies which sometimes transfer to motorsport as well. Anything we can do, we are very happy.

For the team principals: how important is environmentally relevant technology to the future of motorsport?

Nick Fry:
In our view, it is absolutely critical. Formula One should run side-by-side with road car developments. The technologies which we are developing in Formula One should have some linkage to the basic business and in the case of Honda clearly the hybrid technology which is very similar to the KERS system that we are putting on Formula One cars next year is very dear to our hearts. It is featured on the current Honda Civic. We have got a new low cost hybrid being brought out in very large volumes next year and having Formula One and the road car side use relevant technologies is critical. What we hope for the future is that there will be further evolution of environmentally friendly technologies on the Formula One car. It really does work in synchronisation with what we are doing on the other side of the business, so we are very, very supportive. We are very pleased with our green tyres as they match the rest of our car very nicely. So thank you, Bridgestone.

John Howett:
Probably a slightly different view. The main issue is that the carbon footprint of motorsport is extremely small, so the main thrust from Toyota is addressing the real issue which is the fact that we supply 10 million vehicles a year. Our thrust really is to make a real contribution to the core issue. Also to an extent the KERS system next year has the components and, if you like, concept similar to hybrid but because a Formula One car is running wide open throttle over 90 per cent of the time and in a road car hybrid you are using this technology really in city conditions in contributing to, shall we say, reduction in fuel economy, the application is completely different. Whether or not we wish to use Formula One shall we say to convey using its power, ecology and ecological behaviour to consumers is a different issue from the core aspect from our perspective of racing.

Mario Theissen:
A slightly different position again. We are excited about the KERS system and the new regulations. Different from what John says I am pretty sure this will really speed up the development of future road car hybrid power trains. KERS only makes sense to us in Formula One if we are able to increase power density and the power to weight ratio of the KERS components by a factor of four to five compared to current road car solutions. This will immediately spur the development of future road car components as well. It perfectly fits with our approach at BMW to use the Formula One project not just as a marketing tool but as a technology pioneer. We have been able to raise synergies over the years on the power train and this will be taken to an entirely new level with the KERS system and what might follow. We really support the green campaign, although as an engineer I am more interested in the substance than the colour and if it was just about painting something green the true pioneers on the ecological side would have been the old English racing cars which used to be all green. But I think it is an exciting opportunity for motorsport and for Formula One and you know we have been supporting, or have been one of the strongest supporters of KERS from the very first moment.

Hiroshi, tell us how the tyres are behaving this weekend, the initial performance that you have seen so far.

We have the medium and soft compound and I think this circuit, for the first time in dry conditions, is very challenging and interesting but anyhow we are going to support all teams and it should be no problem.

It looks as if the front left tyre is coming in for a lot of hard work.

Yes, this is true. After this session out engineers and the teams' engineers are going to discuss how to maintain the tyres.

To the three team principals: you have been invited to a meeting with the President of the FIA. What specific areas are there where you can see that savings can be made in Formula One?

I think the first thing to say from our side and I think with all the other teams we do feel there is a need to reduce costs. The important thing from our point of view is to reduce costs which frankly are wasted expenditure and I think there are several of those areas. Whether they are enough to meet the targets that we need is another matter. In terms of specifics I think the one that is frequently cited is the area around the brakes and the brake ducts, the so-called keg tins, which surround the discs and duct the air. It is an area where probably the number of physical moulds that are required to make those parts have doubled or even tripled over the past couple of years because the parts are so intricate. We now all have very similar systems and it is very expensive. A lot of the aerodynamic testing goes into that area. It is probably not an area of performance differentiation and that is probably an area where we could do something which reduces costs. I think there is general agreement that the gearbox is an area where we have all now migrated to so-called quick shift gearboxes. I suspect we have all got slightly different mechanisms inside but again it is not a performance differentiator. Another idea that is being worked on is the centre of gravity of the car. Weight reduction or specifying a weight target is one thing but when we spend literally hundreds of thousands of dollars to move weight from slightly higher up to slightly lower down and then add tungsten on the bottom of the car, again is somewhat wasteful and again the general opinion among the technical directors and from Ross (Brawn) who is running that group is that a lot can be done in that area. The power train, the engine, is an area where I know there is more controversy. I think we all do feel that we could migrate to a lower cost power train. The V8 19,000rpm engine we have at the moment is hugely expensive, up to about 300,000 € per unit. They are immensely expensive and going to a different type of engine, maybe a four cylinder engine, would be cheaper with all the environmental technologies hung onto that. I think certainly from the Honda side and I suspect from some of the other manufacturers' sides we would like to preserve the ability to design and make that engine as it is part of our brand identity but making the specification a lot more prescriptive, making it a lot cheaper, is something I think that many of us would support.

John, any specifics?

I don't really want to go into specifics. I think they are unique to each team. I think the meeting which we have been invited to was really following the meeting between Luca di Montezemolo and Max Mosley. I think that the teams have a lot of ideas to actually save money but at the same time not destroy the core DNA or value of Formula One. I think that given a constructive discussion and hopefully shall we say using the current environment of 'financial crisis', people could take a political advantage and try to apply unnecessary pressure and hopefully for once we can put politics behind these discussions and really focus on the facts, the real issues and then we will find, I am sure, good solutions.

Nick has come up with certain specific areas. Is it not possible for you to do so?

Yeah, of course. I mean fundamentally, I am sure teams can say without changing anything, which is what we do regularly by good value added engineering, actually reducing production processes by standardizing tooling, you can make massive savings. That is one issue which absolutely has no impact whatsoever on even the current regulation. If you look at it, this coming year, ironically, we are faced with a totally new aerodynamics package which means the concept of the car changes completely and we integrate KERS, so we are facing, if you like, an environment where cost saving is relevant but all the regulatory changes are technically forcing cost upwards. My position would be, there are a lot of concrete ideas but we need to have a cohesive, focussed unpolitical discussion using facts and we will find a simple solution.



Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
12.05.2006 Granollers, Spain, Hiroshi Yasukawa (JPN), Bridgestone - Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 6, Spanish Grand Prix, Friday
25.06.2017 - Race, Nikki Lauda (AU), Mercedes and Mario Isola (ITA), Pirelli Racing Manager
25.06.2017 - The trophy of Azerbaijan Grand Prix
Turn 8 kerb tweaked after Friday accidents
09.06.2017- Friday Press Conference, L to R Guenther Steiner (ITA) Haas F1 Team Prinicipal Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal and James Allison (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1, Technical Director
09.06.2017- Friday Press Conference, L to R Guenther Steiner (ITA) Haas F1 Team Prinicipal Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal and James Allison (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1, Technical Director
09.06.2017- Friday Press Conference, Guenther Steiner (ITA) Haas F1 Team Prinicipal and Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal
09.06.2017- Friday Press Conference, Maurizio Arrivabene (ITA) Ferrari Team Principal with James Allison (GBR) Mercedes AMG F1, Technical Director
10.06.2017- Mario Isola (ITA), Sporting Director Pirelli
09.06.2017- Free Practice 2, Nick Chester (GBR) Renault Sport F1 Team Chassis Technical Director
Fernando Alonso greets fans at the Spanish Grand Prix
Grid girls.
14.05.2017. Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 5, Spanish Grand Prix, Barcelona, Spain, Race Day.
 - www.xpbimages.com, EMail: requests@xpbimages.com - copy of publication required for printed pictures. Every used picture is fee-liable. © Copyright: Bearne / XPB Images
Mario Isola (ITA) Pirelli Racing Manager.
28.04.2017 - The FIA Press Conference (L to R): Otmar Szafnauer (USA) Sahara Force India F1 Chief Operating Officer; Mario Isola (ITA) Pirelli Racing Manager; Matt Morris (GBR) McLaren Engineering Director.
28.04.2017 - The FIA Press Conference (L to R): Nick Chester (GBR) Renault Sport F1 Team Chassis Technical Director; Luigi Fraboni (ITA) Ferrari Head of Engine Trackside Operations; Yusuke Hasegawa (JPN) Head of Honda F1 Programme.
Romain Grosjean, 2017 Bahrain Grand Prix, Haas F1 Team (credit Haas)
09.04.2017 - Race, Mario Isola (ITA), Pirelli Racing Manager
Start of the Chinese Grand Prix

Start the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.