F1 »

Mercedes joins Ferrari in KERS ban call.

Following Ferrari President Luca di Montezemolo's criticism of Formula 1's new KERS (Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems) technology, Mercedes-Benz has now become the latest of the sport's major players to question the 2009 device.

Di Montezemolo had branded the energy-saving initiative as irrelevant to road car technology and 'a mistake' whose costs are 'very high' [see separate story – click here], and following Honda's shock withdrawal from the top flight at the end of last week, Mercedes-Benz Motorsport Vice-President Norbert Haug told Swiss magazine Motorsport Aktuell that 'the time for games is over' and that the sport's out-of-control expenditure must now be reined in.

Whilst some teams – like BMW-Sauber in particular – are keen to press ahead with KERS, others have been encountering more difficulties, and are in favour of postponing its introduction.

Haug tended to agree, describing KERS as 'an extremely expensive exercise' and arguing that governing body the FIA would do well to put it to one side for now and 'think about it later'. The German contended that in so doing, engine budgets could be slashed by as much as 25 per cent.

Meanwhile, the team principal of Mercedes' F1 partner McLaren has taken a pop at Honda's 'Earth Dreams' campaign, with the Japanese concern having sought to promote an environmentally-friendly message in 2007 and 2008 – a move that some have dismissed as being merely a cover-up to hide the fact that no major sponsors had been forthcoming [see separate story – click here].

Speaking to marketing publication Brand Republic, Ron Dennis admitted that he doubted the sincerity of the Brackley-based outfit's sentiment, insisting: “The most important issue when presenting a green image is that it is authentic.”

“Honda's 'earth car' was driven more by the perception it wanted the public to have than its true objectives,” the 61-year-old added.

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
23.06.2006 Montreal, Canada, Norbert Haug (GER), Mercedes, Motorsport chief - Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 9, Canadian Grand Prix, Friday
Sauber C36 Ferrari
Sauber C36 Ferrari
Sauber C36 Ferrari
McLaren, 2011 launch, [Credit: Crash PA]
Michael Schumacher and the 1996 Ferrari F310
Nico Rosberg and Fernando Alonso - Mercedes, McLaren
Antonio Giovinazzi - Ferrari SF15-T
George Russell, Mercedes junior programme, [Credit: Mercedes]
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Valtteri Bottas - Mercedes AMG Petronas
Ayrton Senna - McLaren. 1993 Donington Park
Nigel Mansell - McLaren-Mercedes
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
Who will replace Nico Rosberg at Mercedes?
Lando Norris, McLaren Autosport BRDC Awards [Credit: Martyn Pass PR]

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

Calvin _

December 10, 2008 12:27 PM

If I remember correctly, KERS isn't mandatory for 2009 anyway. It is for 2010, but teams can introduce it early if they want to. So, they can, if they want to, be more leisurely in their development and get it right, before 2010, rather than racing to get it ready for 2009, when we all know that these things take time to get right. As for a waste of money? That remains to be seen. If it produces more overtaking, then fine, but if, as many people have said, it won't make much difference, then agreed, waste of money. Typical FIA making things up as they go along, not knowing if it will work or not, but imposing it on F1 anyway and making everyone else pay for it, while moaning about costs.

Marc - Unregistered

December 10, 2008 10:49 AM

They both have a point. The FIA are trying to cut costs but are pressing ahead with KERS. doesn''t make sence to me. As for Honda not having a major sponsor, they probably couldn''t find one. Or why would a team going through such financial hardship choose not to take investors on board? and then pull out of f1. On the other hand who has the sort of money to become a new investor in this financial climate?

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.