F1 » Brundle: You can't force commentary box chemistry

Report Comment

You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.

Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.

Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.

It might work, we're going to have to see! I didn't have a problem with Jonathan Legard, to be honest. He had excitability and the right "kind" of voice. Why is it always assumed that the lack of chemistry was Legard's fault? It was surely his job to broad brush and ask Martin Brundle for the details. I always missed Murray Walker, the "voice of motorsport". When I think of classic moments from past eras I can hear his commentary in my mind with the remembered images. But you know what? When I watch the classic F1 races on Red Button, commentary on some of the 70s and 80s ones is, overall, quite amateurish when the rose tinted specs come off.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group | Built by Accelerate Agency

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.