F1 » Villeneuve: Raikkonen was a lucky F1 champion


Report Comment

You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.

Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.

Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.

@Taipan - you are probably right about Andretti. I was never a fan of his in either series. I still think that the car was not very good though. It just showed that at times Senna was able to rise above it's faults on race day. Even then getting passed by Irvine in the Jordan really shows that it was a dog. Indycar has never been at the same level as F1 but in the last 20 to 30 years it was probably the closest just before the split. The cars are different enough that it is really not fair to say which series has the best drivers. Some drivers will excel in one or the other while a rare few can excel at both. Even Mansell had a dismal year in his second Indy season. We forgot to mention Montoya as he did very well in both yet he cannot win on an oval in NASCAR.



© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.