F1 » Your views: DRS, innovation or irritation?


Report Comment

You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.

Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.

Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.

DRS is a joke and F1 is becoming one. The whole spec series thing is about safety. They banned turbos because they were supposedly becoming to quick, they put restrictions on after 2004 for the same reason, yet nobody has died since Ayrton. Massa's incident was just a freak occurence and saftety has become so good that they are going to far with it. F1 is suppose to be innovation and dangerous. Look a moto GP, you can't make that safe - it's the love for it and the risk you take. Aero is too good now, cars can't follow so reduce it and bring back ground effects - then the corner speed is still fast but cars can follow closely. Open the engine development back up. The truth is Bernie doesn't want engineers going nuts, then the field wont be close then the best cars run away to much and less people watch. This is all about Bernie getting more viewers = more money = DRS = spec series.



© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.