You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive.
An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the
comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right
of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary.
This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
"Now that F1 is less predictable than Indycar it has lost some of it's charm. Back when Schumacher was dominating if someone passed him or beat him you knew that something really special had just happened. Now when a top driver gets passed it is not special at all.
Posted by Mark
mark. i have always been of the same opinion....and gotten criticised for it!
when a driver/team is on top of his game and winning all the time, i find it is interesting to see if he can be beaten by an interloper."
...that's just nonsense.
You're saying that what makes F1 insteresting for you is to see someone
a) win a bunch of races
b) get passed by someone else?
That you need to first have a dominant driver/team and then see them get beaten?
Why are you watching F1 in the first place?!? This is just insane.
The fact that there have been so many winners on so few races means nothing moe than there are a bunch of teams in close competition over the course of a race, and yes, a decision here or t