You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive.
An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the
comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right
of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary.
This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
Lewis was not 'lucky' to win his title! He fully deserved it, irrespective of Glock and irrespective of Ferrari and Massa's mistakes because of the pressure of the title run-in. Richard has said over and over on this thread that an F1 champion deserves it, whether that is Lewis, Alonso or Raikonnen! I'm not sure of which part of that Indi is unable to read?
Where he gets impatient, like many others, is where some fans try to pick and choose who is a lucky champion and who is a deserving one, e.g. some Lewis fans will say Button was lucky because he had a good car. And that Raikonnen was lucky because Lewis and Alonso took points off each other. When others respond that Lewis was in a good car and also lucky because of Glock, then they react by saying no, Lewis is the greatest most epic driver of them all. There lies the crux of the matter.
Whatever is good for the goose, the gander and all that...