You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive.
An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the
comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right
of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary.
This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
Indy said it all in his post. And I hear what Locks is saying. The trouble with richard's position (and Vettel/Horner's by default) is the insinuation inherent in their analysis. There is an unspoken insinuation that Narain was at fault for Vettel not winning the race. They are 'implying' it was Narain's fault, but just not coming out and saying so in a direct way. Call it their frustration, analysis or whatever you want, but they are 'implying' it was Narain's fault, using words like 'Vettel was held up'...as if it was intentional on Narain's part.
And there lies the disingenuous nature of their argument - and why some are calling richard a fanboy.