F1 » Horner: 2013 Red Bull ‘late in design’

Report Comment

You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.

Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.

Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.

Agree with droog - mind you Chapman made several quantum leaps during the halcyon Lotus days - change to monocoque from space-frame (25), side mounted rads (72) - and, of course ground effect (78 & 79)(although the rule book then was far less restrictive). The cars' present layout and look still largely reflect Chapman's innovative thoughts. Had he still been around (and had managed to stay out of clink), I wonder what other examples of his genius would we have enjoyed? Newey's brilliance/genius is inevitably hampered by the many restrictions contained in the present rules and regs. His concept of an unrestricted F1 car, though, is both amazing and frightening....

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.