You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
The remarks about the car continue to be lame. Nobody has ever presented a shred of evidence that the RB cars of the last three years have been exceptionally good, even when challenged to do so.
But lets ignore that little detail and assume the RB cars really ARE that good. So what? All the champions of the past - your Fangio's and Stewarts's and Lauda's and Prosts's and Senna's and Hakkinen's and so on - won their titles in decidedly superior machinery. Would Senna have ever won a title if he hadn't driven those great McLaren cars of the period? Probably not. The car has always been a part of winning the WDC - a bigger part in the past than at present. If you want to see drivers compete in identical cars, then follow a different class of racing.