You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
Sam, So you're happy to make the claim that Prost...
"was assisted by the FIA on far too many occasions to state unequivocally that all of his titles were earned on track and deserved"
But when I ask you to list the occasions you suddenly don't want to debate it. The problem that I have with comments like that is that the uneducated will believe you that's why I asked you to back up your claim, and unsurprisingly you can't.
If Balestre was biased towards Prost why was no action taken against Senna for his premeditated attack on Prost at Suzuka 1990? I would have thought that was a perfect opportunity to ban Senna meaning Prost would have won the championship.
I'm guessing you won't want to debate that either as it clearly doesn't fit with your illusions of favouritisim.