You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
bryan. i fully understand the "complexity". the turbo does not power the kers, the transmission does, exactly as it is doing at present. the engine itself has no effect other than to drive the gears. the engine is a "stand alone" unit and creating a new engine is well within the ability of the manufacturers. dont forget, they were building far more advanced turbos in years gone by!
yes yes. you are right, people forget the changes quite rapidly. remember the small rear wings, the stepped nose etc etc. nobody has an issue with these, after a years racing. and as for engines, i have lived through probably 10 engine changes, including turbos etc, and now some are calling for the reintroduction of old formula engines of differing sorts?? in 10 years time, when 1.2 na engines will be required ( ), posters will be calling for the "traditional" 1.6 v6 turbos to be retained, as the sound was "so sweet".