You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
Can't imagine whats going to happen next year when they are running substantially less fuel. Maybe they could get the weight restriction removed if they built a bat mobile? Maybe Pirelli will actually make a tire that can hold itself together next year and not so many people will realize how much less power (stoichiometric ratios people/fuel tank size) next year's cars have.
What's up with commentators assuming less revs equals more torque, what a bunch of spoiled cheese. The torque wont be there if they dont have enough fuel to make it last the whole race. Bring back in race refueling and liberalize the motor regulations and you might see some interesting things coming out of the V6's, but not with reduced fuel, just a lot of covering up, like whats going on in MotoGP with the 1000cc bikes. BTW KERS as it stands right now, doesnt make up for it's weight in fuel, or free weight if it were not mandated implicitly with the weight restrictions.