You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
35. where have I said I dispute the verdict. I have repeatedly said that there were three sides at fault, and even though I might not think the penalty decision was right, I have said that we have to accept it. all I have been doing is straightening some facts that others have been getting confused about. even before the tribunal held that Charlie had no authority to allow the test, I pointed that out, and was shot down by a number of posters.
another fact that confuses some is that Pirelli did not ask for a 2013 car. they invited Ferrari, rbr and merc to "a test". it was merc saying they did not have a 2011 car available, who initiated all this 2013 car problem.
merc "misunderstood" Charlie, and all the hoohaa began.