F1 » Kate Walker: FIA battle puts Ricciardo in the shade

In her latest Crash.net column, Kate Walker looks at why the potential battle looming over the FIA presidency.

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest


September 04, 2013 8:38 AM
Last Edited 974 days ago

"FIA battle puts Ricciardo in the shade "

Not amongst race fans if the comments sections here are any reflection.

Besides, the FIA election is a complete stitch-up.


September 04, 2013 10:10 AM

The world at large is far more interested in Ricciardo than the FIA, more's the pity.
Todt has done a good job, having inherited a nest of vipers and I believe the new engine formula, once under way, will be the way to go.
There is already far too much power in too few hands, particularly the old goat, and a political administrator is not the way to go. Smacks far too much of Commissars.


September 04, 2013 11:30 AM

Richard, Yeah I read that, now that is quite interesting. Also stories going about of BMW returning in 2016 as an engine manufacturer, they must fancy the idea of "seasoning" blocks again!


September 04, 2013 12:21 PM

Frozen Candle, yes she will for sure go far in journalism there is no place like the UK that gives such a chance.
Anyhow when Totd replaced Moseley FI got rid of one half its chronic cancer, a cancer is said that it's deadly when it spreads, God forbid that F1 gets any cronies of that one half cancer.


September 05, 2013 12:59 AM

Is this just a "wind-up" to make the FIA election look democratic or is it genuine.
Todt has a lot of history in motorsport both in Rallying, F1 and other disciplines,- what is his opponents practical background up to now?

Page 1 of 2
1 2  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.