IndyCar »

Chevy formally appeals turbocharger ruling

The IndyCar Series had confirmed that Chevrolet has lodged an official appeal over the decision to allow Honda to change part of their engine turbocharger.
Chevrolet has filed an official appeal against IndyCar's decision last month to allow an upgrade to the single turbocharger unit used in Honda's engines.

IndyCar originally allowed the upgrade on April 18 prior to the Long Beach event but a protest from Chevrolet at the time saw Honda have to reverse the upgrade until the official protest hearing was held on April 28. The three-man panel denied the protest and allowed Honda to make the change ahead of the Sao Paulo Indy 300 in Brazil last weekend, but under IndyCar rules Chevrolet had two business days to appeal the ruling.

The disputed upgrade introduces a 0.74 A/R compressor cover that increases the power of the turbocharger and hence the engine as whole. It seeks to put the Honda's engine back on an even footing with Chevrolet's, which has been dominant so far in the 2012 IZOD IndyCar Series season.

The appeal will be heard next Wednesday, May 9, by a single individual. IndyCar's president of operations and strategy Brian Barnhart has selected retired Indiana Supreme Court Justice Theodore R. Boehm for the role.

Justice Boehm's decision will be final, and neither IndyCar nor either engine manufacturer will be able to further appeal any decision made. Honda representatives will participate in the hearing, and the proceedings will be closed to the public and media

The delay in announcing Chevrolet's formal appeal - which under the rules of the series would have had to have been filed by the end of business on Monday - is thought to be because of discussions to find a suitable person to hear the appeal that would be acceptable to all parties. Under IndyCar rules, Chevrolet will have to pay an additional $20,000 to the series to have the matter referred to a formal appeal.

It was not immediately clear whether a victory for Chevrolet in the appeal would result in repercussions over the use by Honda of the 0.74 A/R compressor cover at Sao Paulo, with IndyCar's permission.

There is no formal deadline for the issuing of the appeal decision by Justice Boehm, although typically the decision is announced on the same day as the hearing or as soon as possible thereafter in order to prevent lingering uncertainty.

With track activity for the 96th Indianapolis 500 scheduled to start just three days after the appeal, IndyCar will be keen to have the matter resolved one way or another before the cars roll out onto the Indianapolis Motor Speedway for the first time.

Relevant parts of the IndyCar rule book read:

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Indy Racing League.  4-6 July 2008. Camping World Grand Prix at the Glen. Watkins Glen International Raceway. Watkins Glen, New York. Honda Indy V8 engines
Ryan Hunter-Reay in the 2012 IndyCar Dallara, with Chevrolet power. [Picture copyright: General Motors and Wieck Media Services, Inc]
Chevrolet`s Camero pace car. [Picture credit: IndyCar Media]
Indy 500 2017 start
Pippa Mann Indy 500 qualifying
Fernando Alonso Indy 500 practice 2
Johnny Rutherford, McLaren-Honda-Andretti [Credit: McLaren Racing]
Fernando Alonso`s McLaren Honda IndyCar is revealed
Fernando Alonso`s McLaren Honda IndyCar is revealed
Fernando Alonso`s McLaren Honda IndyCar is revealed
Fernando Alonso`s McLaren Honda IndyCar is revealed
Fernando Alonso, McLaren-Honda-Andretti, [Credit: McLaren]
2016 Indy 500, Indianapolis Motor Speedway
Firestone tyres during Indianapolis test   [pic credit: Indycar media/Chris Owens]
Alex Rossi, Indy 500 [Credit: IndyCar]
Simon Pagenaud - Team Penske Chevrolet [credit: IndyCar/Bret Kelly]
Simon Pagenaud - Team Penske Chevrolet [credit: IndyCar/Bret Kelly]
Simon Pagenaud - Penske Chevrolet [credit: IndyCar Series]

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.