MotoGP » 'No worries' - Stoner shrugs off another fall

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

rocker - Unregistered

May 01, 2010 1:19 PM

i am not qualified at anything and know nothing about nothing but that dusnt stop me from telling these motor cyclists how to set up their bikes and how to ride them and i know nothin.

rocker - Unregistered

May 01, 2010 1:23 PM

and i can diagnose there illnesses, corect there home work, comment on there wives, sexuality, motivation, pay, value, worth, experience, interpret what they really mean, what should have said and done and all from my chair. I dont even have to no how to spel


May 01, 2010 10:10 PM

:) On this site you go from rage to laughter and on to utter confusion.But at some point you know someone will make you smile.@ rocker that last post of yours just about tells the story :).On a serious note don't know if i am reading too much into it but did Casey look a bit off colour today.Maybe i am just waiting for something to happen but he didn't look as fresh as he did at Qatar.The other thing that was a huge change for Casey is that he didn't improve his time all the way through Quali.And Rossi is the only rider to do a 1.39 straight off.Will have to watch Quali again to check he was on a hard tyre.I think he was.I think Lorenzo looks really good .Could be Rossi & Lorenzo up front.


May 02, 2010 11:44 AM

Thats because most people on here ARE armchair thickos like yourself, you just make post's that are easy to agree with because they are based on what you have read not what you know. Nice to see you took the time and effort to read my post's, perhaps you could take some tips on spelling MENSA boy hoppy haha.


May 02, 2010 2:23 PM

Please see race result and read this article again, no chance of another championship AGAIN this year. I'm quite happy to be quoted on this at the end. He needed luck to win and the first year of the Bridgestone/Ducati mix gave him that lucky edge, since then the previous champions (125, 250, 500, Motogp etc) haven't let him have a second look.


May 02, 2010 4:42 PM

Your logic is blinding in its brilliance mate.People agree with my posts because they are "easy to agree with"!
Wow,did you stay up all night working that out!
You still fail to answer why nearly all on here dissagreed with YOUR posts.What is your answer to that one Sherlock!


May 02, 2010 6:13 PM

Hmmmm, still havent answered my question mate.Why do people disagree with your posts?
It is a simple question for someone of your massive intellect.Why cant you give me an answer?You keep trying to make me look foolish with your snidey remarks but you fail time and again.You just make yourself look like the numpty you are!
Sad,very sad.

Page 7 of 7
« 3 4 5 6 7 

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.