MotoGP » Earthquake greets IndyCar at Motegi


Motegi greets IndyCar with a 'firm shake'...

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

JimmyJimmy

September 18, 2011 2:53 AM
Last Edited 1045 days ago

@Sammy

lololol This is it??? My "good info" is your 'proof' that "I deferred to Smithy's comments"??? Are you on this freakin planet??? :)

Could you get any more desperate to twist things to appear correct Sammy? I can't believe I have to waste my time responding to clear BS.

Firstly, how can "Good info. Thanks Smithy" be thought in any way as a "deferral"?

Secondly, in Smithy's post he raises 5 separate points. 1. Richard is a site moderator. 2. Richard usually commentates on F1 not MotoGP. 3. The MOX comment. 4. Comments about how long the nuclear fuel will burn for. 5. Comments comparing the situation in Japan to Chenobyl.

He discusses 5 separate points but for some reason you are trying to make out that my generic "Good info. Thanks Smithy" specifically relates to his third point about the MOX fuel (the point you believe Smithy has wrong - how convenient)? And this constitutes a "deferral"? lol Nice try Sammy. Are you sure you are not Richard? lol

Thirdly, I ack

JimmyJimmy

September 18, 2011 2:55 AM
Last Edited 1045 days ago

Cont...

Thirdly, I acknowledge that it is ambiguos which specific aspects of Smithy's post I was replying to, and even though I know I was actually saying "Good info." and "Thanks Smithy" for his information about Richard, I can see that you can say I'm just saying this after the fact. But what about Smithy's reply to my "Good info. Thanks Smith"? You know, Smithy's reply you have conveniently left out in your "proof of my deferral"? For some reason you are conveniently over-looking Smithy's reply to me. Why is that?

When Smithy replies to my "Good info. Thanks Smithy" he goes on to tell me more about Richard. He is clearly interpreting my "Good info. Thanks Smithy" as being relation to the information he gave me about Richard, just as I had actually intended. So tell me thi

JimmyJimmy

September 18, 2011 2:56 AM
Last Edited 1045 days ago

Cont...

So tell me this Sammy. If my original intent was to thank Smithy for the good info on Richard and then Smithy goes on to certainly interpret it that way and Smithy's interpretation was there for all to read, including you - if that all constitutes the FACTS of the situation (as opposed to your BS spin of the situation), can you tell me how you intepreted my "Good info. Thanks Smithy" as being a "deferral to Smithy's view on the nuclear science of the issue"?

Nice attempt to snaffle the lazy $100 buddy lol

In my previous reply to you I said that you were either intentionally lying or not real sharp in the reading and comprehension department. I was wrong and I must restate what is now clear. You are intentionaly lying AND you are not real sharp in the reading comrehension department. I clearly underestimated who I was dealing with.

I hav

JimmyJimmy

September 18, 2011 2:57 AM
Last Edited 1045 days ago

Cont...

I have to thank you for something. Thanks for trying to twist what I have said to try to put words in my mouth. Thanks for pretending a comment like "Good info. Thanks Smithy" in reply to a post with 5 points is a "deferral" to 1 specific point from those 5 points. Thanks for pretending the lazy $100 is yours when the opposite is true.

The reason I thank you (and Richard) is this. In my original post on the issue of racing in Japan, I put forward the point of view that those saying the racing in Japan should go forward fell into one of three categories - those who were greedy, those with an agenda, those with an intelligence deficiency. I thank you because you have proved my point. You fall into at least two of those categories. It is clear now that I should have added a fouth category of 'those who are dishonest'. You'd be batting at least 3 from 4. Well done.

Below is the rep

JimmyJimmy

September 18, 2011 2:58 AM

Cont...

Below is the reply (in its entirety) from Smithy you conveniently omitted in your "proof of deferral". This is Smithy's reply to my "Good info. Thanks Smithy" post. Clearly Smithy did something you were incapable of doing. He interpreted my post as it was meant.

"No probs, he's pretty easy to pick as he always tows the official party line.

Much like this site really who has its base with the official party room and is completely agenda driven.

You will have probably noticed by now how selective they are in deleting posts. Anything anti Rossi or anti Japan or anti anything they are pro for gets deleted as will these posts.

The old timers here know it all to well, I think we annoy them for being honest."

Acid Rain - Unregistered

September 18, 2011 5:38 AM

Jeezuz Jimmy. You have more damn patience and restraint than I would have shown. They are so obviously trying to twist your words and speaking all manner of nonsense to try to do it.

Sammy, I am not going to indulge you the way Jimmy has. You are not very bright and you are a fraudster. How the hell can a "good info, thanks" be seriously misconstrued as a "deferral" to one specific aspect of a post. Do you work in sales? For some reason you think people can't see right through you.

Also Sammy, what the hell do earthquakes in Turkey, China and California have to do with the nuclear issue in Japan? Could you make a point with less sense? Oh.... I take that back.

I enjoy your posts Jimmy. Always objective rather than running off an agenda or bias. On this occasion though, you were too kind to indulge this guy.

i want 100 too - Unregistered

September 18, 2011 5:54 AM

sammy

look up the dictionary

defer - to yield to the judgement of another

how does "good info. thanks smithy" match that

i think you should pay every person who has had to read your post $100. i feel dumber for reading it

Saitama Sammy - Unregistered

September 18, 2011 1:40 PM

I'll see all all of u in two weeks at Motegi along with the professional riders that deferred to the experts in nuclear power and the associated dangers. Feel free to donate that $100 to Red Cross of Japan. Thats more productive than arguing with someone trying to live in the shadow of Fukushima...since it seems y'all have time on ur hands

JimmyJimmy

September 18, 2011 2:05 PM
Last Edited 1044 days ago

@Sammy

If you think the riders and teams are going to Motegi because of free will you are deluded. Riders themselves have stated that they don't won't to go but they are constrained by circumstance and, in some cases, have outright been pressured into going by their employers.

As usual Sammy, you pretend that facts that do exist don't exist. Pretty much nothing you say makes much sense.

Page 5 of 5
« 1 2 3 4 5 

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.