MotoGP » Mixed MotoGP reviews for new Valencia surface

“The surface sucks; especially in the wet” – Casey Stoner.

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

pcxmac - Unregistered

November 09, 2012 6:23 PM

"Sykes' best lap of 1m 32.8s" -- Valencia Test, 2012

“I think I could have gone maybe even 0.5 seconds faster, I'm sure. " -- Sykes.

Should be interesting to see how a properly prepped production bike measures up to the so called prototype uber bike class.

lean two

November 09, 2012 6:37 PM

Funny how Cassy says whatevers on his mind and gets flammed for it... but when Edwards says My bike is a piece of shyt we're all laughing... Cassy
Stoner ... always making friends lol...

damo.666 - Unregistered

November 09, 2012 6:38 PM

Casey sounds like someone at work who's handed in is notice and now feels like he can say what he wants... have a bit of dignity bloke...
Brilliant rider
Uncompromising Aussie
Big gobby moaner...

damo.666 - Unregistered

November 09, 2012 6:45 PM

Actually @lean two makes a good point..... stoner says 'it sucks' he's moaning, Edwards says 'its ****' and he's loved for it....
All boils down to who is you personal favourite I suppose....


November 09, 2012 6:47 PM
Last Edited 1187 days ago

you're spot on lean two.

And sure he may say what he wants, but from my perspective it's better than lying about it... I want to know how these blokes think.

I think it's Stoners "delivery" of his words that make them less acceptable than Edwards.

johno - Unregistered

November 09, 2012 8:37 PM
Last Edited 1187 days ago

I just dont get commenting on a track surface that is the same for everybody. You can bad mouth your bike because you are the only one riding it, but what is to be gained by saying the surface sucks. Lorenzo didnt feel the need to go that direction.

Page 1 of 2
1 2  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.