MotoGP » Hayden under WSBK time on day two, Dovi absent


Nicky Hayden puts Ducati MotoGP machine fastest at Jerez,new team-mate Andrea Dovizioso absent

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest
Filter Comments: All | Registered

jjrocco - Unregistered

November 30, 2012 1:17 AM

Where are all the people laughing at Hayden now? It's so silly to even use testing times at this stage as any type of comparison. Its testing and during a test, you're not trying to win points. You're trying to make your machine the best it can be for next year. And you don't do that by going all or or showing your true speed before next year. Madness....

confused - Unregistered

November 30, 2012 3:54 AM

Honestly I am pretty shocked that an all out prototype racing machine with a former world champ on it could only beat a WSB by only a tenth! That is shocking to me. But what really confuses me is why the CRT bikes are so much slower? Surely the CRT bikes have less restrictions than the WSB's proper, yet they are slower?

R69 - Unregistered

November 30, 2012 4:23 AM

Ahhh come on guys, i didn't hate WSBK, we must realize if WSBK can compete with MotoGP and it should mean "compete".

and badly, I guess Honda, Yamaha, Ducati have a WSBK bike too, so if WSBK bike have same performance as MotoGP bike why they spend lot of money just to get that "0.090s"???

and BTW Nicky best time with ducati on this track much better than this, 1'39.560... and this is short track, can you imagine how in Sepang, Philips, Qatar, etc.

For me let it be, WSBK for the pride of Commercial Bike, MotoGP for the pride to Prototype Bike..

Page 1 of 4
1 2 3 4  › »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please do not post any personal abuse or attacks.

  • (this will never be displayed, but is required for email notification of follow-up comments)

    Email me when this topic is updated.

Note: Your comment may take a few minutes to appear

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.