MotoGP » MotoGP Rider of the Year vote: 3rd

You vote Casey Stoner 3rd in's MotoGP Rider of the Year poll

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

RJ - Unregistered

December 30, 2012 2:35 PM

(Continued)Of the comparable tracks (excluding rain, etc.)Rossi had a higher average speed at 7, Stoner at 5. I think we can call that "as fast or faster". We certainly can't call that "Crushed".

Ian - Unregistered

December 30, 2012 3:38 PM

Only a blind fool would think Rossi equaled Stoner in speed on the Ducati. I know one person who doesn't believe it. Rossi! The whole argument between stoner and Rossi is absurd. People consider stoner one of the greatest ever because of his outright speed and bike control. It's not about wins or championships or showmanship.

doohan - Unregistered

December 30, 2012 6:57 PM

125 250 500 800 990 yamaha honda aprillia 2 stroke 4 stroke suzuka 8 hr ,9 times world champ ,stoner aint even on the same page ,hunger injury etc rossi been at top since 96 ,stoner burnt out taking 2 titles in 10 yrs .disagree agree who cares rossi posted up a pic 3hrs ago got 50000 likes already ,bottom line HE IS THE SPORT

Hemmy - Unregistered

December 30, 2012 7:57 PM


And your point is? What are you trying to suggest by looking at the avergae top speed figures? LOL.

Lets throw Haydens figures for 2011 in too then shall we?...........

Qatar 323.9/324.0
Estoril 323.1/322.8
Le Mans 283.2/287.6
Catalunya 319.8/324.4
Assen 300.8/297.8
Mugello 328.5/330.4
Laguna Seca 264.1/264.8
Brno 289.7/292.0
Indianapolis 320.2/318.2
Misano 273.6/274.0
Aragon 325.1/328.8
PI 319.0/317.8
Val 222.4/213.4
Silv 287.0/283.3
Jerez 261.2/258.6
Sach 276.4/276.9

So Hayden also beat many of Stoner average top speed figures too. And he beat Rossi 7 times too.

So what are you saying? That both Hayden and Rossi rode better than Stoner?

Maybe, just maybe, it has something to do with the 2011 Ducati being faster than the 2010 Ducati. LOL!

You gotta love the things that Rossi fans come out with. It so easy to blow to pieces their lame attempts to defend him. LOL.

Hemmy - Unregistered

December 30, 2012 8:02 PM

Oh and 'Doohan', just to blow your silly somment to pieces, dont you think its strange that since Stoner arrived, Rossi stopped winning so much? Why do you think that was? LOL.

Yep thats right, because the guy who arrived on the scene in 2006 beat your hero many more times than Rossi beat him.

So if you think Rossi 'is moto gp', then of course thats fine, but lets not forget but the guy who think 'is moto gp' was beaten by Stoner more often than not. LOL!

Hemmy - Unregistered

December 30, 2012 8:06 PM

@ Doohan
So Rossi gets 50,000 likes on facebook in 3 hours. Big deal. LOL!

What do you think Rossi would prefer, 50,000 likes on facebook or to have been able to beat Stoner on track more often.

Tricky one huh.

You have to admire Rossi fans for providing so much entertainment on here. LOL!

Hemmy - Unregistered

December 30, 2012 9:43 PM

@Time? For you to notice that im on here often, must mean that your on here just as often too, right? LOL.

Yes i have plenty do anyway buddy.

Of course inbetween i always like to check for ridiculous posts on here to comment on and very often rip apart with reletive ease. Especially silly posts from Rossi fans. LOL!

Pretty much like your post in fact. LOL!

doohan - Unregistered

December 30, 2012 10:14 PM

@hemline 2 titles each since stoner arrived ,rossi at the back end of his career like schumacher alonso etc dont mean anything stoner got beat up in125 250 check rossis record at 27 bit different to stoners which is why rossi is world wide renound and still going and stoner had to quit ,plus he still puzzled who the dad is as he got no balls

Page 14 of 18
« 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.