MotoGP » Four teams to run control ECU in MotoGP 2013

Ioda, Avintia, Forward and PBM to run new MotoGP control ECU system in 2013

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest


January 10, 2013 1:28 AM

Just think of how many millions of Euros/Yen in Honda engineering would go down the tubes if they allowed the teams 2 more liters of fuel. The biggest expense in MotoGP just for a few bucks worth of fuel.


January 10, 2013 9:26 AM

Yes, mpg IS an issue - but MotoGP is not the place to address that issue. They use thousands more litres in their Transport, Flights, Hire Cars etc.

There are far better ways to develop fuel economy strategies than MotoGP. A powerful road bike probably spends less than 0.1% of its run time at anything like full throttle. Also spends 99% of its run time at WAY below max revs, & where it makes fraction of its peak power. So what is being developed on a high-rev race engine, being used totally differently to any real-world application can ONLY mean its of use to gain a racing advantage. I bet its as much use a chocolate welding torch for anything else.

It's all a big con, and a smokescreen to distract fans from the reality. Just like politicians do - they create a furore about somethig emotive and insignificant, to stop voters concentrating on the real issues IMO.


January 10, 2013 9:43 AM

TalentFan or is it Citizen Smith?
What better way is there to develope fuel economy strategies? You can do it on a dyno but it does not give you the real picture. Do you think they would spend millions on Motogp if you could simply do it on a computer?
People saying how succesful and good F1 is, at the moment its all about when you use your liquorice tyre or DRS. What use are they for a road vehicle?

What are the real issue's that they are creating a smokescreen for?


January 10, 2013 9:44 AM

I'm guessing that - if you took away the TC and the ability to fine-tune the bike to maximise it for every second of track time, then the fuel would self-regulate ANYWAY to some degree?

Yes, a human cannot regulate the throttle as well as the computer. So yes, this means that the human may well not regulate the throttle to SAVE fuel quite as well. But... it also means that the human may not be able to OPEN the throttle as HARD, as often, and BURN as much fuel too? Either way, the extra 4L allowance for CRT's proves its not all that big an issue.

The real interest in Racing is about HUMAN endeavour, HUMAN skill, HUMAN bravery, HUMAN effort, HUMAN everything. If it wasn't we'd be seeing stupid raging debates about Honda v Yamaha, not Rossi v Stoner eh?


January 10, 2013 9:50 AM

@ RSMick "TalentFan or is it Citizen Smith?
What better way is there to develope fuel economy strategies?"

How about like they do it anyway? Like by running real-world road testing using real-world engines being developed for road use?

I'm just pointing out that adoption and development of these Software strategies and fuel saving strategies in racing has no other purpose than to make it so that you need to have a massive R&D development budget and team (ergo a massive advantage) to make a racing motorcycle go round and round as fast as possible with a limited amount of fuel. So, the ones who can afford to spend enough and gather enough data and crunch it can get an advantage no-one else has a hope of getting.

So, the factories have 'won' the race before they even leave the pit for Quali in reality. Which means (as I keep pointing out) that its NOT RACING. Its more like a lot of fast televised demonstration laps.


January 10, 2013 9:55 AM

For you it is, for a lot of us its about human skill and engineering excellence. If you believe there is no human skill involved, then why are there only 4 or 5 or can master these bikes? You may say they have the best bike but they weren't just given them when they decided to start racing, they had to earn them first, the best get the best. Put Lorenzo, Pedrosa, Stoner and Rossi and to some extents Dovizioso on a SBK the result would be the same, as it was when these guys rode 2 strokes.

If you want a more human approach go and watch some MZ racing or type underbone racing in youtube. Even better watch cycling.


January 10, 2013 10:04 AM

@ RSMick "What are the real issue's that they are creating a smokescreen for?"

How much clearer can I make it? The real issues are that MotoGP racing has been & is being compromised to being an uncompetitive farce, while fans are having it sold/marketed to them as a competitive racing series.

Where is the depth of competition? Which riders in 2012 (assuming no team orders or other interference) had a remotely level chance of competing for a dry win? JL, BS, CS & DP - 4 riders (maybe).

My 'agenda' is pointing out that MotoGP isn't being regulated for the benefit of the racing and the fans, but for the Mfrs. What's yours Mick?


January 10, 2013 10:12 AM

If you put the 'best' on a machine that is unassailable & so much better than the bulk of the field - then how do you know he's the best?

For all we know, the top CRT rider, Espagaro MIGHT be better than Lorenzo! We cannot know FOR SURE now can we?

We can say that JL is the best rider on a factory bike, and that the factory bikes are faster and with better tech / rider aids / strategies than anything else. Nothing more than that, as no-one else has a fair shot at racing them.

MotoGp has been like a Le Mans 24-Hr race - except at least there they point out that the cars run in different classes, and that a tin-top isn't classified in the same results sheet as a prototype.


January 10, 2013 10:25 AM

"for a lot of us its about human skill and engineering excellence"

There's plenty of scope for engineering excellence in motorcycle racing without direct factory involvement which is steering that engineering in directions that wreck the purpose of MotoGP (yup, that'll be the racing again).

F1 demonstrates that there are incredible engineering firms doing the development work for factories all the time for a start. There's a long history of the likes of Ford using Cosworth, Lotus etc as one example.

Like F1 and many other racing series - there's no shortage of engineering excellence that could come into MotoGP & might be happy to do so if it was a) affordable and b) not rigged so they haven't a prayer.

Page 5 of 8
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.