Yamaha's engine strategy explained
Recommended Comment

RECOMMENDED COMMENT

10 agree. 3 disagree.
Report Abuse
Here in the UK, Colin Edwards is HUGELY popular. At Donnington last year (and the last couple of years before), he got most cheers after Rossi. What does that tell you? Yawn all you want but like it or not, charisma and personality plays a big part of MotoGP, it's what keeps riders popular with the fans. Yes we all know Stoner is better in MotoGP (Colin was genius in WSB though), if Colin had had Stoner or Pedrosa's personality, he would have gone a year or 2 ago. His personality keeps the money coming in! We love Edwards!
Posted by AFX - Unregistered (674 days ago)
Recommended Comment
Sort Comments: Oldest   |   Newest

MOTOGP » Yamaha's engine strategy explained

Tech 3 team principal Herve Poncharal explains who was riding what during testing at Sepang - and how Yamaha's engine strategy will unfold heading into the new season.

Add Comment

Have Your Say Comments
2 disagree.
Report Abuse
So Yamaha gives support for both motors? Why not just give Tech 3 the old, and the new when it's ready? Is it if the new doesn't work out? So Rossi doesn't have to go back to the old 07 but have at develloped 07 ready. :?
Posted by Spacelord (673 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 agree. 2 disagree.
Report Abuse
My guess is they keep developing the 'normal' engine as a backup,
in case the pneumatic valvespring engine isn't reliable enough. So Tech 3 benefit from that too.
I'm very happy that they decide to press on with the new engine, it means they are committed. ;)
Posted by The Morgue (673 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
When the say "developed the old engine" I bet all there've done is tweek the ports/head, maybe refined the exhaust, definatly worked on new software.
Posted by Ace27 . (673 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
I gathered they altered the bore/stroke though Furusawa admitted they were already very close to the critical piston speed
what was it 17 m/s? I forgot the exact number :blush:
Posted by The Morgue (673 days ago)
Last Edited 673 days ago
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
3 agree.
Report Abuse
I think i read in rapid bikes the Triumph 675 piston spins up to 17,18,19m/s or something like that, Id ssumed a motogp bike would beat that for sure????
Posted by Ace27 . (673 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
3 agree.
Report Abuse
17 m/s is the figure I learned in Engineering school, it probably didn't apply to racing bikes ;-)
The limitations are probably set by the materials used for pistons and treatment of cylinder walls.
Posted by The Morgue (673 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 agree.
Report Abuse
end of last season yamaha said it wasn't goin to carry on development with the pneumatic engine,so why the u turn,yamaha dont like u turns it took rossi and burgess to convince them to go to a 16v head and dump the 20v the season before.
interesting thing is that i've read that schwantz is lined up for a suzuki team next year as manager
yamaha know that the suzuki was stronger than them last season and that rossis contract expires at the end of this season
Posted by dave wall (673 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 agree.
Report Abuse
17 m/s is quite old.

Even an R6 exceeds 22 m/s. A MotoGP bike could go up to 24 - 26 m/s!!

Any one knows the stroke of one of the GP-bikes?

Example: 2008 spec R6:
stroke: 42.5 mm
1 rev : 2 strokes
max. e-speed 16000 rev/min = 267 rev/sec

42,5 mm *2*(16000/60)[rev/s] / 1000[mm/m]= 22.7 m/s
Posted by Harryx - Unregistered (673 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
3 agree. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
Thanks Harryx,

Ther you go. Proves what an old fashioned guy I am ;-) like I said the number didn't apply to racing bikes...

Kevin Schwantz is one of Valentino's idols (besides the late Norick Abe), you never know.
This is the year of truth for Yamaha I think.
Posted by The Morgue (673 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 disagree.
Report Abuse
Hey Morgue, like I said; Stoner will have to work for it this year. Only at the IRTA test in Jerez we'll know more about the realistic potential of the teams.

But still, if the usual suspects stay rubber down and don't get into blowing up parts of their bikes, then a lot of them could get really close. Consistency was the word in the last 2 years and I'm sure it will be the case even more this year. I mean losing your points once could throw you off for the rest of the year. :rolleyes:

(Actually 17 m/s is for cast iron engines :blush:) At a certain point the instantaneous piston speed can get so high (> 40 m/s) that aerodynamically and inertia wise you get in to "trouble". :-o
Posted by Harryx - Unregistered (673 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments

Have Your Say Comments
Page 2 of 3
« 1 2 3  »
Have Your Say Comments


Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us using the [Report Abuse] function next to the offending comment post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service will be edited or removed with immediate effect. Crash Media Group prohibits defamatory posts.
 
Site Map
© 1999 - 2009 Crash Media Group
The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.

Contact Crash.Net  |  Advertise on Crash.Net  |  Our Privacy Policy  |  About Crash.Net  |  Get News Feeds  |  Need a Website?

Find car reviews on sports cars such as Ferrari, BMW, Porsche and many more.