Stoner keeps 'new set-up' on top
Recommended Comment

RECOMMENDED COMMENT

17 agree. 4 disagree.
Report Abuse
Don't you guys think it's Bridgestone that determines the amount of laps on a tire?

He was doing tire testing, which I would imagine would be at the discretion of the tire manufacturer.

Are we that insecure that we bash him for everything single thing he does? You guys are unbelievable. Replace Rossi with Stoner in this article and you guys would be creaming your shorts.

I guess it's too hard to congratulate someone and move on.
Posted by wolfpac - Unregistered (464 days ago)
Recommended Comment
Sort Comments: Oldest   |   Newest

MOTOGP » Stoner keeps 'new set-up' on top

Casey Stoner smashes Brno lap record to remain fastest on the second and final daty of MotoGP testing.

Add Comment

Have Your Say Comments
1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
actually the front of the female anatomy yes? :)
Posted by telefonary - Unregistered (463 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
Report Abuse
I guess the crack by Telefonary is a joke otherwise he/she is interested in Jack.
Posted by Marc - Unregistered (463 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
Jack,
"more weight on them means more ground pressure and less grip"
Cobbl..s! More ground pressure means less mu but as mu drops off much more slowly than the load increases, the net result is more grip. Mech Eng BSc 1 Physics BSc 0
Posted by eadgbe - Unregistered (463 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
Report Abuse
Thanks Eadgbe I thought I was going mad, I'm neither a scientist nor a bachelor :p but I always thought that you needed load otherwise how would the tyres grip and collapse to give a bigger grip surface, with no load the bike would slide away, certainly in cars the whole idea is to increase load through corners to improve grip....
Posted by tweedle dee - Unregistered (463 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 2 disagree.
Report Abuse
Telefonary- thanks for proving me right.

eadgbe- If you want a conversation please don't turn it into a match. We are having enough of this bull**** here already. You are wrong because you forget that vertical load becomes also sideways load (in a linear way) when you are trying to turn. If you get down with the equations you'll see that if you create a function that combines friction coefficient with velocity and turn radius the weight is irrelevant. Of course the friction coefficient isn't a given number but changes with ground pressure and so weight in the end DOES become relevant but not in the way our intuition tells us.
Posted by Jack Mordino (463 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
For the doubters, read "Motorcycle handling and chassis design" by Tony Foale, a very interesting read (more than 600 pages!). Foale says that you have a 10% reduction in grip each time you double the weight.
Posted by Jack Mordino (463 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
In English please Jack, do you mean that the lighter the bike the better the grip??(providing the tyres work)and is there a stage when the bike becomes too light??
Posted by tweedle dee - Unregistered (463 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
Well, there seems to be some misunderstanding here, I suspect me and eadgbe are saying the same thing. With "grip" I mean the sideways acceleration the bike can create, which means how hard (or fast in other words) the bike can turn. I think eadgbe means the centripetal force alone. If this is the case we are both right.

In english: the bike turns faster when it becomes lighter. There is a limit to that because of necessities in chassis rigidity and also because of implication created by a large unsprung-to-sprung ratio (if the wheels are heavy compared to the rest of the vehicle you have a reduction of grip). You can also have an increase of grip if you make the tyres wider.
Posted by Jack Mordino (463 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 agree. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
In very simple words:

a bike can turn as fast as: (How good your rubber is)*(how wide your tyres are)*(how light your vehicle is). This doesn't count for the wet and how fast the bike can flick from side to side (for this you want narrow tyres) so overall you end up making compromises.

Try playing with a used tyre and throw it rolling sideways on the road, you'll see it can achieve insane lean angles!
Posted by Jack Mordino (463 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
Bet Peter Williams would understand!
Posted by AvTech37 - Unregistered (463 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments

Have Your Say Comments
Page 7 of 17
« 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  »
Have Your Say Comments


Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us using the [Report Abuse] function next to the offending comment post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service will be edited or removed with immediate effect. Crash Media Group prohibits defamatory posts.
 
Site Map
© 1999 - 2009 Crash Media Group
The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.

Contact Crash.Net  |  Advertise on Crash.Net  |  Our Privacy Policy  |  About Crash.Net  |  Get News Feeds  |  Need a Website?

Find car reviews on sports cars such as Ferrari, BMW, Porsche and many more.