MotoGP »

Qatar MotoGP: Honda explains standard ECU agreement

"This is what we always insisted was the key point for Honda" - Livio Suppo.
One minute Honda was threatening to quit if MotoGP made a single ECU compulsory, the next a rule is unanimously passed to make the Dorna-supplied hardware and software mandatory for all from 2016.

So what changed?

The official explanation, provided by Repsol Honda team manager Livio Suppo, is that Honda's position had been misunderstood in the past. Honda was not actually against a standard ECU, but against standard ECU software without any opportunity for development.

"One thing is to have a single software for everybody, frozen, which means nobody can do anything. And this we were against. But another thing is to have the single software for everybody, but with the possibility for each manufacturer to continue developing it," Suppo told the official MotoGP website.

"Of course this will mean that we will not have any more secrets, any advantage in case you find something special. But we leave the door open to the possibility to develop technology. This is what we always insisted was the key point for Honda.

"Each manufacturer will be able to provide suggestions to develop things by himself, as far as he will share with the others."

However Honda never previously mentioned this opportunity for agreement on the drawn-out single ECU issue. And is shared development of the standard ECU even a new concept?

After all, shared development of the standard ECU (currently only mandatory for the Open class) has been in operation since last year's debut of the Magneti Marelli-built system, with each manufacturer invited to make requests for changes to the software.

It certainly isn't frozen - MotoGP director of technology Corrado Cecchinelli telling in February: "I will be really happy if we all understand that the Open [standard] software is constantly 'moving' upon the customer requests. It is just a matter of resources and the time it takes to make things - but we will make things. It is not something that will remain steady."

This was perfectly illustrated when Ducati, planning an Open move, made a major contribution to the standard ECU software during the winter, raising it to new heights and perhaps proving to Honda that a single ECU - which must accommodate many different types of machine - could be significantly modified and offer factory level performance.

The other explanation is that Honda simply realised - with Ducati set to exploit the (probably deliberate) Open class loophole and others sure to follow - it would no longer be possible to keep bespoke factory software and so cut the best deal available under the circumstances.

"All current and prospective participants in the MotoGP class will collaborate to assist with the design and development of the [2016] Championship ECU software," said the Grand Prix Commission announcement. "During the development of the software a closed user web site will be set up to enable participants to monitor software development and to input their suggested modifications."

Standard ECU hardware is already mandatory.

Tagged as: Honda , ECU

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Pedrosa`s Honda, Sepang MotoGP test, 26-28 February 2014
Aegerter dash
Miguel Oliviera - KTM RC16 MotoGP
Morbidelli, Bagnaia, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Luthi, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Alex Marquez crash, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Bagnaia, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Navarro, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Manzi, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Quartararo, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Corsi, Bagnaia, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Corsi, Bagnaia, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Quartararo, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Schrotter, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Cortese, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Cortese, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Luthi, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017
Alex Marquez crash, Moto2 race, German MotoGP 2017

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


March 21, 2014 1:01 PM

Translation. Dorna have called our bluff and we folded. Why? Certainly not because of any "development" opportunity whitewash. If you believe that then Valentino Rossi is really the Easter Bunny, lord Lucans mystery love child and Willy Wonka all rolled into one. Honda are staying because there's no way they don't want the brand exposure across the planet that MotoGP provides. It's all about the marketing and promotion folks, and that's all there is to it. This waffle is just their attempt to make their total reverse and climb down look a bit less of an embarrassment. They pushed too hard and made one dire threat too many and finally they've been stood up to. And not before time. Maybe now Dorna have finally caught on they'll actually start enforcing and making rules that look after MotoGP racing properly. I hope so.


March 21, 2014 1:49 PM

@ rbr46 You REALLY think that any of this bespoke, racing specific electronics is going to filter down to road bikes? Er.... No. Where's the corner specific data settings for every road on the planet going to come from, that suit every rider and every condition? Etc., etc. Road bikes have solutions that are already more than will ever be needed. If you get more it'll be due to more marketing dept meets gullible punter than stuff anyone actually needs. Years ago I think Bike Magazine ran a data logger on a one litre sports bike to find out just how much of its power and performance was used by a very good professional rider on the road. I can't recall all the details but recall that for something like over 90% of the time the typical power use was around 40bhp or less! You really think a road rider needs switchable power maps and other such gimmicks, let alone corner by corner settings? Look at something like Yamahas MT-07. That has more performance than the vast majority of

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.