16 September 2004
'No stopping for rain' debate continues...
by Peter McLaren
The recent announcement that, from next year, there will be no stopping for rain in premier-class racing has resulted in considerable debate throughout the MotoGP world - not least among the participants of the Crash.net MotoGP forum - with a great deal of uncertainty raised by the following brief statement released by the FIM:
"In the MotoGP class only, in case of rain, the race will not be interrupted."
It remains to be seen exactly how the riders will be able to continue racing regardless of the weather, but it appears most likely that they will be offered the chance to make some sort of pit stop which will end – one way or another – in the rider rejoining the circuit on a bike better suited to the new conditions.
When to pit?
How this set-up change (from dry to wet) will be achieved is a matter for the rule makers, and still to be announced, but regardless of the method (ranging from a tyre change to a whole bike swap) the key to the rule's success is likely to involve making the 'changeover time' - the total time lost entering the pits on a dry set-up bike and getting back up to full speed with a wet set-up - as small as possible.
The biggest criticism the new rule faces is that 50-minute MotoGP races are too short, proportion wise, to encourage riders to make a pit stop – which even in its shortest form would be equivalent to a ride through penalty (the pit lane speed limit is 85km/h) – unless the rain is very heavy, or falls early in the race.
As an illustration, consider the following simple formula, the type of which could be used to determine if and when a rider should pit in the case of rain:
Pit for rain set-up when:
(Time lost per lap with dry set-up x number of laps remaining) > (changeover time lost)
In other words, pull into the pits only when the time lost by staying out on a dry set-up exceeds the time lost in changeover, by the end of the race.
Clearly, this is a simplistic view – factors such as race position and time advantage/disadvantage, the rider's wet weather ability, an assessment of risk, how much time will be lost overtaking slower riders after a pit stop and not least the likelihood of the weather changing – would also be taken into account.
Meanwhile, estimating the time lost per lap by staying on slicks is also more difficult than its sounds; the tyre suppliers are likely to provide an estimate, but an accurate indication will only be found when a rival - or ideally a team-mate - makes the change from dry to wet set-up.
Nevertheless, the laps remaining and changeover time are easily found - in the latter case, once the rules are finalised - and the fact remains that to help prevent riders taking risks on slicks (by encouraging them to pit as soon as possible) the rule makers will have to come up with a system that makes the time lost during changeover as short as possible.
Click on relevant pic to enlarge
the conversation - Add your comment
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.