MotoGP »

MotoGP tipped for three cost cuts.

The MotoGP World Championship is tipped to make three main cost-cutting rule changes for the 2010 season.

In the face of the global financial crisis, and the recent withdraw of the factory Kawasaki team - potentially lowering grid numbers to just 17 this season, unless Kawasaki agrees to the formation of a privateer team to run its ZX-RRs - there has been mounting pressure to slash the cost of competing in the premier class, to prevent further departures and encourage new entries.

With only minor changes possible in time for the 2009 season, Motociclismo reports that the Grand Prix Commission will meet in March to approve more radical plans for 2010: Limiting each rider to one bike, banning carbon brakes and forcing each engine to last for three grand prix weekends.

The removal of carbon brakes may prompt calls of 'dumbing down', but has no significant side effects, while limiting each rider to one bike will have consequences in terms of flag-to-flag racing.

A penalty (grid positions, points etc) will also need to be agreed for an early engine change, and may prove unpopular with fans since the result they see on track may not reflect the 'official' result.

For example, a rider may qualify on pole position, but then start the race from tenth on the grid because of a penalty imposed for an engine change earlier in the weekend.

Interestingly, Formula One, on whom the engine life rule is presumably based, has now switched away from a consecutive grand prix system - instead setting a limit for the total number of engines a team can use over the whole season and letting the teams chose when they want to use them. Note that F1 has an engine development freeze in place.

“It's eight engines for the whole [2009 F1 season],” FIA race director Charlie Whiting confirmed on Tuesday. “A driver will only incur a penalty if he uses a ninth engine. So the teams can use the engines as they like. There's no three consecutive race rule because there doesn't seem to be a need for it any longer. The engines will not have to do three complete events now.

“In the past the two-race engine was used only on Saturdays and Sundays. Now, for 17 races, the eight engines will have to do the three days of each grand prix. What the teams will do is to have a Friday engine that'll probably do the first four races or something of that nature. They'll then take the engine out and use another one for Saturday and Sunday. All we've got to do - it'll be extra work - is to make sure that these engines remain sealed and are untouched.”

Formula One, responding to the recent loss of Honda, has also effectively eliminated in-season testing and recognised the need to put a cap on the amount of money spent away from the race track during wind tunnel testing.



Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Stoner, Valencia MotoGP 2008
Rossi at 2016 Monza Rally Show (Monster)
Marquez at FIM Gala
Smith crash, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Smith crash, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Smith crash, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Smith crash, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Smith, Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Sam Lowes, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Sam Lowes, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Pirro, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Petrucci, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Petrucci, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


Mike Moloney - Unregistered

January 28, 2009 9:36 AM

Cost-cutting is a big red herring. MotoGP is a rolling warfare laboratory where new technologies are rapidly proved or disproved. Freezing development is a disservice to both manufacturers and consumers. Cut the real fat, the huge travelling entourages that go to each event. At the 2003 Britich GP I counted 103 articulated lorries in the paddock. Do the major squads really need 3 arctics for a 2 man squad? Other than to suck up to supposed VIPs does every team really need its own massive mobile restaurant? They didn't in Sheene's day and the show on the track was just as good.



© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.